Add E2E GitHub workflow and fix beacon selector

[google-labs-jules]

This PR adds a GitHub Actions workflow for end-to-end testing of the reverse shell REPL and updates the tests/e2e/tests/e2e.spec.ts file.

Changes:

• Created .github/workflows/e2e.yml to run E2E tests on PRs and push to main.
• Updated e2e.spec.ts to improve the beacon checkbox locator (.chakra-card input[type="checkbox"]), addressing an issue where the test would incorrectly toggle filter switches instead of selecting a beacon.

---

PR created automatically by Jules for task 6361868067365826252 started by @KCarretto

[google-labs-jules]

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

---

For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.

[github-actions]

Summary

Tests 📝	Passed ✅	Failed ❌	Skipped ⏭️	Other ❓	Flaky 🍂	Duration ⏱️
2121    ↑583	2121    ↑585	0    ↓2	0    ±0	0    ±0	0    ±0	1ms    ±0

Previous Results

Build 🏗️	Result 🧪	Tests 📝	Passed ✅	Failed ❌	Skipped ⏭️	Other ❓	Flaky 🍂	Duration ⏱️
#3282	✅	2121	2121	0	0	0	0	not captured
#3268	❌	1538	1536	2	0	0	0	not captured
#3266	✅	2103	2103	0	0	0	0	not captured
#3265	✅	2103	2103	0	0	0	0	not captured
#3258	✅	2103	2103	0	0	0	0	not captured
#3251	✅	2422	2422	0	0	0	0	26.4s

Insights

Average Tests per Run	Total Flaky Tests	Total Failed	Slowest Test (p95)
2065	0	2	49.4s

Fail Rate

Fail Rate	0.02%    ↓0.01

Test 📝	Results 📊	Passed ✅	Failed ❌	Fail Rate (%) 📈
eldritch: pivot::ssh_copy_impl::tests::test_pivot_ssh_copy	18	17	1	5.56    ↓1.11
eldritch: pivot::ssh_exec_impl::tests::test_pivot_ssh_exec	18	17	1	5.56    ↓1.11
eldritch: pivot::ssh_exec_impl::tests::test_pivot_ssh_exec	18	17	1	5.56    ↓1.11
eldritch: pivot::ssh_copy_impl::tests::test_pivot_ssh_copy	18	17	1	5.56    ↓1.11
eldritch: pivot::ssh_copy_impl::tests::test_pivot_ssh_copy	18	17	1	5.56    ↓1.11
eldritch: pivot::ssh_exec_impl::tests::test_pivot_ssh_exec	18	17	1	5.56    ↓1.11

Failed Tests

No failed tests ✨

Slowest Tests

Test 📝	Results 📊	Duration (avg) ⏱️	Duration (p95) ⏱️
eldritch: random::string_impl::tests::test_string_uniform	17	40.7s	49.4s
eldritch: random::string_impl::tests::test_string_uniform	17	40.7s	49.4s
eldritch: random::string_impl::tests::test_string_uniform	17	40.7s	49.4s
eldritch: random::string_impl::tests::test_string_length	17	5.9s	9.9s
eldritch: random::string_impl::tests::test_string_length	17	5.9s	9.9s
eldritch: random::string_impl::tests::test_string_length	17	5.9s	9.9s
eldritch: pivot::port_scan_impl::tests::test_portscan_return_type_starlark_dict_from_interpreter	18	1.8s	9.4s
eldritch: pivot::port_scan_impl::tests::test_portscan_return_type_starlark_dict_from_interpreter	18	1.8s	9.4s
eldritch: pivot::port_scan_impl::tests::test_portscan_return_type_starlark_dict_from_interpreter	18	1.8s	9.4s
eldritch: process::info_impl::tests::test_info_default	18	1.4s	9.4s

_{🍂 No flaky tests detected across all runs. | ⏱️ Measured over 6 runs.}

Github Test Reporter by CTRF 💚

🔄 This comment has been updated