Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Grammatical improvement in documentation #1746

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

mourjo
Copy link
Contributor

@mourjo mourjo commented Feb 29, 2024

This fixes a minor grammatical error present in the following public page: https://docs.spring.io/spring-data/relational/reference/jdbc/transactions.html

  • You have read the Spring Data contribution guidelines.
  • You use the code formatters provided here and have them applied to your changes. Don’t submit any formatting related changes.
  • You submit test cases (unit or integration tests) that back your changes.
  • You added yourself as author in the headers of the classes you touched. Amend the date range in the Apache license header if needed. For new types, add the license header (copy from another file and set the current year only).

@spring-projects-issues spring-projects-issues added the status: waiting-for-triage An issue we've not yet triaged label Feb 29, 2024
@mp911de mp911de added type: documentation A documentation update and removed status: waiting-for-triage An issue we've not yet triaged labels Mar 4, 2024
@mp911de mp911de self-assigned this Mar 4, 2024
mp911de pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 4, 2024
This fixes a minor grammatical error.

Closes #1746
@mp911de mp911de closed this in 69e6872 Mar 4, 2024
@mp911de
Copy link
Member

mp911de commented Mar 4, 2024

Thank you for your contribution. That's merged and backported now.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type: documentation A documentation update
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants