Skip to content

Conversation

@jrainville
Copy link
Member

Description

Here is the tentative Status App for Q1 of 2036

@sunleos , @alaibe and I met to discuss the features everyone in the team put in the brainstorming document and prioritized them. We only got up to the 2.38 features, but that's enough to give an idea of the start of the year.

The rest of 2.39 will be added later.

This PR is open to comments from everyone, feel free to recommend what to prioritize, if we missed anything, etc.

@jrainville jrainville requested a review from a team as a code owner December 9, 2025 18:56
@jrainville jrainville requested review from a team, alaibe, glitchminer, osmaczko, sunleos and vkjr and removed request for a team December 9, 2025 18:56
@status-im-auto
Copy link
Member

status-im-auto commented Dec 9, 2025

Jenkins Builds

Commit #️⃣ Finished (UTC) Duration Platform Result
✔️ 30089b1 #1 2025-12-09 19:06:25 ~9 min tests/nim 📄log
✔️ 30089b1 #1 2025-12-09 19:07:17 ~10 min android/arm64 🤖apk 📲
✖️ 30089b1 #1 2025-12-09 19:09:36 ~12 min ios/aarch64 📱ipa
✔️ 30089b1 #1 2025-12-09 19:10:08 ~13 min tests/ui 📄log
✔️ 30089b1 #1 2025-12-09 19:15:14 ~18 min macos/aarch64 🍎dmg
✔️ 30089b1 #1 2025-12-09 19:17:05 ~20 min macos/aarch64-nwaku 🍎dmg
✔️ 30089b1 #1 2025-12-09 19:17:26 ~20 min linux/x86_64 📦tgz
✔️ 30089b1 #1 2025-12-09 19:20:13 ~23 min linux/x86_64-nwaku 📦tgz
✔️ 30089b1 #1 2025-12-09 19:29:15 ~32 min windows/x86_64 💿exe
✔️ 30089b1 pr19540 2025-12-09 19:32:49 ~15 min tests/e2e 📊rpt

@status-im-auto
Copy link
Member

Copy link
Member Author

@jrainville jrainville left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One thing we talked about in the Release Process meeting is defining Key Features marking the cut of the release.

I think we should mark those with a star (⭐ ) in the roadmap so that it's clear to everyone that once those features are done, we will cut the release and anything not done should be pushed to the next release. Since every new feature should be behind a feature flag, it shouldn't affect anything.

In this case, I would propose the following features as Key Features:

  • Mobile feature parity
  • Mobile Dapp browser
  • Privacy Mode

What do you guys think?

Copy link
Contributor

@noeliaSD noeliaSD left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks a lot @jrainville for this update. I’ve left a few comments and suggestions.

docs/roadmap.md Outdated
- [Memory and Performance improvements](https://github.com/status-im/status-desktop/issues/18296)
- No provided FURPS at the moment as this is mostly about profiling and fixing issues found.
- In Progress ⏳ 🟩🟩🟩⬜⬜ 64%
- [Improve Token List and Support custom tokens](https://github.com/status-im/status-desktop/issues/19517)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It might be a good idea to run some testing across the following areas, as they could reveal additional tasks for this epic:

  • Permissions
  • Mint
  • Airdrop
  • Profile Showcase / Collectibles
  • Join Community, Share Addresses and Community Requirements Check flows
  • Manage Token Settings

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, the Epic linked is actually the known bugs and things to fix related to the feature. I don't think it's worth listing all of those here, but we should for sure test all of those as part of it before releasing!

@noeliaSD
Copy link
Contributor

One thing we talked about in the Release Process meeting is defining Key Features marking the cut of the release.

I think we should mark those with a star (⭐ ) in the roadmap so that it's clear to everyone that once those features are done, we will cut the release and anything not done should be pushed to the next release. Since every new feature should be behind a feature flag, it shouldn't affect anything.

In this case, I would propose the following features as Key Features:

  • Mobile feature parity
  • Mobile Dapp browser
  • Privacy Mode

What do you guys think?

  1. I like the idea of marking them with a star.
  2. Regarding the Mobile Feature Parity section, we currently list five independent features under this epic. Would it make sense to prioritise them individually? Some of these features may be more relevant or impactful than others.

Copy link
Member Author

@jrainville jrainville left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the review @noeliaSD !

Regarding the Mobile Feature Parity section, we currently list five independent features under this epic. Would it make sense to prioritise them individually? Some of these features may be more relevant or impactful than others.

My own opinion is that they are all necessary for the Mobile app to behave at lest as good at the old app, so I'd like to have them all in 2.38.

I'll still list them all in a bullet list under it so it's easier to follow. Let's see what the team and community think, ie can some of them be de-scoped?

docs/roadmap.md Outdated
- [Memory and Performance improvements](https://github.com/status-im/status-desktop/issues/18296)
- No provided FURPS at the moment as this is mostly about profiling and fixing issues found.
- In Progress ⏳ 🟩🟩🟩⬜⬜ 64%
- [Improve Token List and Support custom tokens](https://github.com/status-im/status-desktop/issues/19517)
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, the Epic linked is actually the known bugs and things to fix related to the feature. I don't think it's worth listing all of those here, but we should for sure test all of those as part of it before releasing!

@status-im-auto
Copy link
Member

@status-im-auto
Copy link
Member

@status-im-auto
Copy link
Member

@status-im-auto
Copy link
Member

@status-im-auto
Copy link
Member

@status-im-auto
Copy link
Member

@status-im-auto
Copy link
Member

@status-im-auto
Copy link
Member

@status-im-auto
Copy link
Member

@status-im-auto
Copy link
Member

@status-im-auto
Copy link
Member

@status-im-auto
Copy link
Member

@status-im-auto
Copy link
Member

@status-im-auto
Copy link
Member

@status-im-auto
Copy link
Member

@status-im-auto
Copy link
Member

✔️ status-desktop/e2e/prspr19540 🔹 ~17 min 🔹 b98f027 🔹 📦 tests/e2e package

@status-im-auto
Copy link
Member

@osmaczko osmaczko requested review from caybro and micieslak December 11, 2025 15:58
@status-im-auto
Copy link
Member

Jenkins Builds

Click to see older builds (11)
Commit #️⃣ Finished (UTC) Duration Platform Result
✔️ 30089b1 PR19540 2025-12-09 19:54:12 ~24 min tests/e2e-windows 📊rpt
95f20b4 #2 2025-12-10 18:29:54 ~7 min macos/aarch64-nwaku 📄log
✔️ 95f20b4 #2 2025-12-10 18:32:19 ~10 min tests/nim 📄log
✖️ 95f20b4 #2 2025-12-10 18:34:53 ~12 min ios/aarch64 📱ipa
✔️ 95f20b4 #2 2025-12-10 18:36:23 ~14 min tests/ui 📄log
✔️ 95f20b4 #2 2025-12-10 18:38:34 ~16 min macos/aarch64 🍎dmg
✔️ 95f20b4 #2 2025-12-10 18:41:07 ~19 min linux/x86_64 📦tgz
✔️ 95f20b4 #2 2025-12-10 18:46:08 ~24 min linux/x86_64-nwaku 📦tgz
✔️ 95f20b4 #2 2025-12-10 18:55:07 ~32 min windows/x86_64 💿exe
95f20b4 pr19540 2025-12-10 18:56:26 ~15 min tests/e2e 📄log
✔️ 95f20b4 PR19540 2025-12-10 19:21:53 ~26 min tests/e2e-windows 📊rpt
Commit #️⃣ Finished (UTC) Duration Platform Result
✔️ b98f027 #3 2025-12-10 19:35:20 ~9 min android/arm64 🤖apk 📲
✔️ b98f027 #3 2025-12-10 19:39:45 ~14 min tests/nim 📄log
✖️ b98f027 #3 2025-12-10 19:40:58 ~15 min ios/aarch64 📱ipa
✔️ b98f027 #3 2025-12-10 19:42:32 ~16 min macos/aarch64 🍎dmg
✔️ b98f027 #3 2025-12-10 19:44:24 ~18 min tests/ui 📄log
✔️ b98f027 #3 2025-12-10 19:45:43 ~20 min linux/x86_64 📦tgz
✔️ b98f027 #3 2025-12-10 19:48:02 ~22 min linux/x86_64-nwaku 📦tgz
✔️ b98f027 #3 2025-12-10 19:48:03 ~22 min macos/aarch64-nwaku 🍎dmg
✔️ b98f027 #3 2025-12-10 20:00:33 ~34 min windows/x86_64 💿exe
✔️ b98f027 pr19540 2025-12-10 20:03:19 ~17 min tests/e2e 📊rpt
✔️ b98f027 PR19540 2025-12-10 20:22:28 ~21 min tests/e2e-windows 📊rpt
912fb1eb #4 2025-12-12 05:27:49 ~9 min android/arm64 📄log

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants