Open
Conversation
Here is a refactored version of the code. Repeated logic has been extracted into utility functions to reduce redundancy and improve readability.
refactored code seems more readable
Here a shorter and more readable version of the current code
Collaborator
|
@jacqueline-57b Could please review this PR? |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Here is a refactored version of the code. Repeated logic has been extracted into utility functions to reduce redundancy and improve readability.
This PR introduces a comprehensive test suite for the RoyaltyModule and related licensing and revenue-sharing mechanisms. The tests cover multiple scenarios, including attaching licenses, registering derivatives, paying royalties, transferring revenues to vaults, and validating claimable revenues.
Key Additions:
Setup and Initialization:
Fetching signers.
Registering license terms for royalty policies (LAP and LRP).
Establishing connections for licensing modules, royalty modules, and royalty policies for multiple users.
Test Scenarios:
License Attachment and Derivative Registration:
Attaching licenses (e.g., Commercial Remix License) to IPs.
Registering derivative IPs under existing parent IPs using various royalty policies.
Royalty Payments:
Executing royalty payments on behalf of another entity.
Verifying the transaction hashes for successful executions.
Revenue Transfers and Vault Integration:
Transferring revenues between derivatives and parent IPs to respective vaults.
Fetching vault addresses and ensuring accurate revenue flows.
Revenue Claims:
Checking claimable revenue tokens.
Executing revenue claims for specific IPs and validating the results.
Utility Methods for Reusability:
setupRoyaltyModules: Configures the royalty and licensing modules for all signers.
registerLicenseTerms: Handles license term registration for the provided policy.
attachLicense, registerDerivative, payRoyalty, transferToVault: Modular helper functions for repetitive operations.
Testing:
All tests are structured to ensure proper execution and include comprehensive logging for verification. Assertions are included to confirm expected outcomes, including:
Transaction hash validations.
Revenue calculations for multiple IPs based on predefined formulas.
Claimable revenue validations using BigInt assertions.
Technical Details:
Mock tokens (MockERC20) are used for payments.
License terms include parameters such as commercialRevShare, defaultMintingFee, and currency settings.
Royalty policies (LAP and LRP) dictate the revenue-sharing behavior between derivatives and parent IPs.
Impact:
These tests ensure the robustness and accuracy of the RoyaltyModule and its integration with licensing systems. They validate the end-to-end functionality, from license registration to revenue claims, enabling confidence in future deployments.
Related Issues:
(Link to related issues if applicable)
Checklist:
Code adheres to the project's style guidelines.
All new and existing tests pass locally.
Documentation has been updated for newly introduced features.