MACS3 callpeak vs HMMRATAC #1955
Unanswered
DineshRavindraRaju
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hello All,
With the new Cell Ranger ARC v2, the built-in peak caller has improved compared to earlier versions. I’m wondering about best practices for downstream analysis with Seurat/Signac + MultiVI:
If ARC v2 already produces a higher-quality peak set, is it still recommended to re-call peaks with MACS3?
I’ve seen that HMMRATAC (implemented in MACS3) can give more biologically meaningful peaks . In practice, how does this compare to the ARC v2 peak sets or standard MACS3 in particular to 10xMultiome?
For downstream tasks like integration, clustering, differential accessibility, and peak-to-gene linking — which peak caller tends to give the most reliable results?
I’d really appreciate advice on whether it’s worth re-quantifying with external peak callers after ARC v2, or if ARC peaks are sufficient for most workflows.
Thank you!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions