-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25
Add helper fn to construct VirtualTable from go primitives #163
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
benbellick
wants to merge
2
commits into
substrait-io:main
Choose a base branch
from
benbellick:virtual-table-helper
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not one of the approvers (or reviewers) so... take it or not... I'm not really sure that this kind of logic belongs with the builders. Go types can get pretty complex pretty fast; not sure the library itself should carry this complexity.
But even ignoring the above, if maintainers think it's useful (and , I do think its definitely applicable and a common enough task for Go users of this library), then at least I'd encourage not to expand the Builder interface. I think a standalone function should work just fine; And also, we might want to consider adding it to the "literal" package -- it's a utility that constructs virtual scan from literals; maybe that package is a better home for it?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hey, thanks for the comment. I think that is a great point. I'll look into moving it to another place briefly. Thanks!
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Moved to the
literalspackage 👍Also, I know that you're not one of the reviewers, but just rerequested you because I want everyone (to the extent possible) to be happy with the change! Thanks