Refactor webL10n.js for Improved Readability and Maintainability

[Ashrafmuhmed]

Description

This pull request refactors the webL10n.js file to improve readability and maintainability. The following changes have been made:

• Fixed formatting (spacing, indentation).
• Renamed unclear variables for better understanding.
• Split large functions into smaller, reusable ones.

[github-actions]

❌ Some Jest tests failed. Please check the logs and fix the issues before merging.

Failed Tests:

synthutils.test.js
turtle-singer.test.js

[walterbender]

We need to think about whether or not we want to maintain these changes locally. But it does make the code easier to read.

[Ashrafmuhmed]

I understand that the i10n library might change in the near future. However, since I’m very interested in this idea, I believe these refactoring changes will make it easier for anyone working on this part of the project to understand the existing implementation.

Also, I noticed that webL10n.sugarizer.js could benefit from similar refactoring, so I’ve also started working on improving it. Let me know if you have any thoughts on this!

[walterbender]

OK. I'll test these changes.

[Ashrafmuhmed]

just following up, any progress on the review?
@walterbender

[github-actions]

❌ Some Jest tests failed. Please check the logs and fix the issues before merging.

Failed Tests:

synthutils.test.js
turtle-singer.test.js

[Ashrafmuhmed]

Sorry about that, this commit should be in another branch under working.

[github-actions]

✅ All Jest tests passed! This PR is ready to merge.

[github-actions]

❌ Some Jest tests failed. Please check the logs and fix the issues before merging.

Failed Tests:

SaveInterface.test.js

[pikurasa]

@Ashrafmuhmed perhaps you can look into why the "SaveInterface.test.js" test is failing?

[walterbender]

I suspect a rebase would fix it.

[walterbender]

But I still have my doubts about making these changes. We should be using the min version of the code here and let the upstream un-minimized version be where users go to explore how it works.

[Ashrafmuhmed]

Understood. If we use the minified version here, where should we place the unminimized version for users to explore? Any suggestions?

[walterbender]

Maybe we should add a README.md file to the lib directory that explains what min files are and how to find the upstream versions? But no need to keep the expanded versions here.

[Ashrafmuhmed]

Agreed. Let's add the README.md and clarify everything there. Should we also create a folder named upstream-version to include the unminified code for reference? We can start making these changes right away.

[github-actions]

✅ All Jest tests passed! This PR is ready to merge.

[github-actions]

This pull request has been open for more than 60 days without any activity. It will be closed in 3 days unless the stale label is removed or commented on.

[github-actions]

Closed pull request due to inactivity for more than 63 days.