Skip to content

Conversation

@t-oster
Copy link
Owner

@t-oster t-oster commented Oct 6, 2013

See #176.
TODO:

@t-oster t-oster mentioned this pull request Oct 6, 2013
@mgmax
Copy link
Collaborator

mgmax commented Oct 6, 2013

What is the difference if we don't use the highest possible resolution?
BTW: With 200dpi a pixel is 0,127mm wide and I doubt anyone can see a position difference of 0,1mm, so that would not matter.

@t-oster
Copy link
Owner Author

t-oster commented Oct 6, 2013

Well the only reason I could think of, would be somebody trying to cut in a very low resolution, which will have a different position after mapping to the grid than the move-head position will be, but that's rather artificial. So I guess just taking the highest resolution makes most sense.

@krekr
Copy link

krekr commented Oct 10, 2013

This is awesome! I haven't had the time to check out the version you hacked together, but I will soon.
One thing I'm thinking is: even if you're working with Epilog machines or "stock Laos firmware", you could just send an empty job with only a move-to-position command, right? Or have it only "cut" out a rectangle of the bounding box with the laser power off. I don't know the protocols that well, but this should be possible.

@t-oster
Copy link
Owner Author

t-oster commented Oct 10, 2013

Hi...as pointed out the problem is, that the lasercutter would move to the desired position, but immediately return to the 'home' position

@peteruithoven
Copy link
Contributor

You could add a ticket to the LAOS issue queue to ask for something like a "gotoRest" boolean in the configuration. This could enable and disable the automatic movement to a rest position. (The rest position is something else then the home position)
http://redmine.laoslaser.org/projects/laos/issues

@t-oster
Copy link
Owner Author

t-oster commented Oct 10, 2013

I already did this in their Issue list ( LaosLaser/Firmware#10 know they still have an additional redmine though.

@peteruithoven
Copy link
Contributor

Ah I see. I forgot. I think we/they mostly use redmine's issue queue.

@krekr
Copy link

krekr commented Oct 11, 2013

Good enough for me ;)

@t-oster
Copy link
Owner Author

t-oster commented Oct 12, 2013

well... it already sends an empty job, so it should also work with other lasercutters...

@t-oster
Copy link
Owner Author

t-oster commented Oct 27, 2013

well there will be more features (at least for the LAOS) as soon as the new "direct-execute" format is there, but I will merge this anyways, since it should not break anything.

t-oster added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 27, 2013
Feature: Move head to mouse position.
@t-oster t-oster merged commit 3a18268 into develop Oct 27, 2013
@t-oster t-oster deleted the feature-move-head-position branch October 27, 2013 08:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants