-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18
Tests update for OAuth login #42
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
WalkthroughThe Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant T as Test Driver
participant U as UI
participant W as OAuth Popout
T->>U: Check for "#login-button"
alt Button Found
T->>U: Click login button
U-->>T: Return window handles (including OAuth popout)
T->>W: Switch to OAuth window
alt Consent Button Found ("#allow")
T->>U: Click consent button "#allow"
U-->>T: Process consent
T->>U: Switch back to original iframe
else No Consent Button
T->>U: Input username and password
T->>U: Click submit
T->>U: Switch back to original iframe
end
else Button Not Found
T->>T: Return early without further action
end
Poem
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
tests/TestFiles/Modules/Web.php (2)
187-191
: Consider clarifying early return scenario.
If#login-button
is absent, the code immediately returns. This might be intentional (e.g. user is already logged in), but adding a brief comment or a log statement indicating the reason could help future maintainers.
210-214
: Confirm presence of login form elements.
Before sending credentials to#password
, consider adding or reusing a short wait or check for the form’s readiness. This helps avoid potential race conditions in slower environments.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
tests/TestFiles/Modules/Web.php
(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
tests/TestFiles/Modules/Web.php (1)
tests/TestFiles/Modules/Webdriver.php (5)
find_and_check_element
(65-71)find_element_and_click
(73-75)get_driver
(43-45)wait_for_frame_and_switch
(179-189)find_element_and_input
(77-79)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
tests/TestFiles/Modules/Web.php (2)
193-208
: Window switching and existing login handling appear well-structured.
Switching to the last opened window for OAuth and detecting the#allow
button to handle existing sessions looks correct and aligns logically with the framework’s element-check strategy.
215-225
: Final consent toggle is handled appropriately.
Clicking#allow
and switching back to the original window and iframe is sensible. Make sure to keep consistent with any upstream changes in OAuth providers that might rename or remove this button.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
.github/workflows/ui-tests.yml (1)
70-70
: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionConsistency Notice: Mismatched Cache Action Versions
The build job now usesactions/cache@v3
, whereas the tests job still relies onactions/cache@v2
(line 70). For consistency—and to ensure uniform caching improvements—consider updating the tests job to useactions/cache@v3
.🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
70-70: the runner of "actions/cache@v2" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/ui-tests.yml (1)
22-22
: Compatibility Check: Updated actions/cache@v3 Usage in Build Job
The caching step in the build job now usesactions/cache@v3
, aligning with our upgrade efforts. However, a static analysis hint notes that this version may not be fully supported on older GitHub Actions runners. Please verify that ourubuntu-latest
runner environment works reliably withactions/cache@v3
.🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
22-22: the runner of "actions/cache@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro (Legacy)
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/ui-tests.yml
(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
.github/workflows/ui-tests.yml
22-22: the runner of "actions/cache@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Chores