Editorial: module namespace exotic objects are immutable prototype exotic objects#3611
Open
michaelficarra wants to merge 2 commits intomainfrom
Open
Conversation
Member
|
I would prefer not to try to mess with the meaning of "immutable prototype exotic object". Possibly we could find a way to do away with the term entirely. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This removes the definition of
[[SetPrototypeOf]]for module namespace exotic objects (which was identical to that of immutable prototype exotic objects), making them actually fit the definition of immutable prototype exotic objects.