Search results

Request for opinion on alternative

Status: Open.

#81 In tc39/proposal-binary-ast;

· dmchurch opened on Apr 13, 2024

Solved by W3C EXI?

Status: Open.

#80 In tc39/proposal-binary-ast;

· ghost opened on Feb 8, 2021

What is the current status of this proposal?

Status: Open.

#79 In tc39/proposal-binary-ast;

· Becavalier opened on Sep 24, 2020

[question] I have a question that Binary AST file can be translated directly to bytecode or it should be translated to standard AST and then translated to bytecode in browser?

Status: Open.

#78 In tc39/proposal-binary-ast;

· zhijs opened on Jul 20, 2019

Modify IDL order if all JS engines benefit

Status: Open.

#77 In tc39/proposal-binary-ast;

· arai-a opened on May 20, 2019

Function.prototype.toString()

Status: Open.

#76 In tc39/proposal-binary-ast;

· xorgy opened on May 17, 2019

Consider a compressed file format with pre-shared dictionary.

Status: Open.

#75 In tc39/proposal-binary-ast;

· pmeenan opened on Apr 13, 2019

Could the AST be based on a reduced subset of productions?

Status: Open.

#74 In tc39/proposal-binary-ast;

· dead-claudia opened on Feb 20, 2019

Consider splitting LiteralNumericExpression to LiteralInt32Expression + LiteralFloatExpression

Status: Open.

#73 In tc39/proposal-binary-ast;

· dead-claudia opened on Feb 20, 2019

Could the binary AST be...a bit more binary?

Status: Open.

#72 In tc39/proposal-binary-ast;

· dead-claudia opened on Feb 20, 2019

Consider merging LiteralInfinityExpression into LiteralNumericExpression

Status: Open.

#71 In tc39/proposal-binary-ast;

· RReverser opened on Feb 5, 2019

Add verification of property names vs identifiers

Status: Open.

#65 In tc39/proposal-binary-ast;

· syg opened on Sep 27, 2018