Infrequent polling benign exception

[THardy98]

What was changed

Added infrequent polling sample that uses BENIGN category for the application failure

Why?

Sample parity + demonstrate usage of BENIGN

[CLAassistant]

All committers have signed the CLA.

[cretz]

Thanks! If you have the available time, to reach real parity would be to add the other two polling samples so we can close #12, but if on limited time or want to handle that elsewhere, no problem

[cretz]

Looking good, only minor things. Would be nice if there was a test to ensure this sample keeps working, but not technically required.

[THardy98]

Looking good, only minor things. Would be nice if there was a test to ensure this sample keeps working, but not technically required.

added a test :)

[cretz]

added a test :)

Missing a push?

[THardy98]

added a test :)

Missing a push?

yup 🙃 sorry

[cretz]

Nothing blocking, though to pass CI may need to fix Rubocop issues and skip time-skipping test in certain environments.

[cretz]

Not sure if all environments will support time skipping. In our Ruby SDK base Test class we have:

  def skip_if_not_x86!
    skip('Test only supported on x86') unless RbConfig::CONFIG['host_cpu'] == 'x86_64'
  end

And we invoke that at the top of any test that needs time skipping. May want to do the same here.

[THardy98]

added to the best test.rb file that the tests inherit from, added to test