Skip to content

bump(main/libgnutls): 3.8.13#29997

Merged
robertkirkman merged 1 commit into
termux:masterfrom
PChaicot:libgnutls
Jun 2, 2026
Merged

bump(main/libgnutls): 3.8.13#29997
robertkirkman merged 1 commit into
termux:masterfrom
PChaicot:libgnutls

Conversation

@PChaicot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@PChaicot PChaicot commented Jun 1, 2026

No description provided.

@robertkirkman
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Is it ok for this package to be on auto update? 49 packages depend on this package. Would adding a minor version guard (checking if the major or minor version numbers change) to this package preemptively prevent libgnutls version 3.9 from coming without us being able to check whether all reverse dependencies need to be recompiled?

@robertkirkman
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

robertkirkman commented Jun 2, 2026

The 2023 update to version 3.8 suggests that reverse dependencies of libgnutls did not need to be recompiled for version 3.8 after having been previously built with version 3.7,

but I'm not sure how to tell whether in the future it could happen even if it didn't previously.

@PChaicot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

PChaicot commented Jun 2, 2026

Is it ok for this package to be on auto update?

no, i just removed TERMUX_PKG_AUTO_UPDATE=true from build.sh

@robertkirkman robertkirkman merged commit eeb3de8 into termux:master Jun 2, 2026
11 checks passed
@TomJo2000
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Is it ok for this package to be on auto update? 49 packages depend on this package. Would adding a minor version guard (checking if the major or minor version numbers change) to this package preemptively prevent libgnutls version 3.9 from coming without us being able to check whether all reverse dependencies need to be recompiled?

There's already a version guard in the package further down.
Did you want something additional?

@robertkirkman
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Oh, thanks for pointing that out. I did not notice that this package already had that.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants