Skip to content

Update logging for containerization - #5095

Draft
jsvarova wants to merge 19 commits into
theforeman:masterfrom
jsvarova:SAT-46952-logging-workflow
Draft

Update logging for containerization#5095
jsvarova wants to merge 19 commits into
theforeman:masterfrom
jsvarova:SAT-46952-logging-workflow

Conversation

@jsvarova

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What changes are you introducing?
Adding a chapter on containerized logging.

Why are you introducing these changes? (Explanation, links to references, issues, etc.)

Containerized Satellite 6.20 replaces the traditional file-based logging model with a journald-centric architecture. This is a breaking change: log file paths that administrators have relied on for years (/var/log/foreman, /var/log/candlepin, /var/log/httpd) no longer exist in containerized deployments. Without updated documentation, administrators cannot view service logs, configure log levels for troubleshooting, collect diagnostic data for support cases, or manage log retention to prevent disk exhaustion. The parent epic SAT-43762 (priority: Blocker) explicitly requires that administrators can perform all of these tasks. Every existing script, monitoring integration, and mental model built around traditional log paths must be updated.

Contributor checklists

  • I am okay with my commits getting squashed when you merge this PR.
  • I am familiar with the contributing guidelines.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added Needs tech review Requires a review from the technical perspective Needs style review Requires a review from docs style/grammar perspective Needs testing Requires functional testing labels Jul 22, 2026
@jsvarova
jsvarova marked this pull request as draft July 22, 2026 21:29
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jul 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@aneta-petrova aneta-petrova changed the title Sat 46952 logging workflow Update logging for containerization Jul 23, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Needs style review Requires a review from docs style/grammar perspective Needs tech review Requires a review from the technical perspective Needs testing Requires functional testing Not yet reviewed

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant