Skip to content

Conversation

@ehelms
Copy link
Member

@ehelms ehelms commented Apr 3, 2023

This makes a change to whitelist logic to require steps to be explicitly marked as 'skippable' in the code to be whitelistable by users. Previously, everything was assumed to be skippable and steps had to be marked that they could not be whitelisted. This can lead to steps in processes like upgrades being skipped by users when they should not be causing more problems.

This may have an impact on users used to skipping certain steps, but will enforce more forethought on what a user should be able to skip.

I am starting this as a draft, as it's a reversal of logic, and should include a review of all possible steps that we may deem skippable at the outset. This is also a bit tricky because there may be cases where the step and the context have to be taken into consideration -- which this solution does not provide an answer for at present.

Steps that have currently been marked skippable were pulled from our documentation.

This makes a change to whitelist logic to require steps to be
explicitly marked as 'skippable' in the code to be whitelistable by
users. Previously, everything was assumed to be skippable and steps
had to be marked that they could not be whitelisted. This can lead
to steps in processes like upgrades being skipped by users when they
should not be causing more problems.

This may have an impact on users used to skipping certain steps, but
will enforce more forethought on what a user should be able to skip.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants