Skip to content

use pulp_smart_proxy not smart_proxy_pulp#81

Merged
evgeni merged 2 commits intomasterfrom
pulp-smart
Jun 24, 2025
Merged

use pulp_smart_proxy not smart_proxy_pulp#81
evgeni merged 2 commits intomasterfrom
pulp-smart

Conversation

@evgeni
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@evgeni evgeni commented Feb 18, 2025

No description provided.

@evgeni evgeni force-pushed the pulp-smart branch 2 times, most recently from c9e29fd to ee4812a Compare February 26, 2025 12:00
pulp_worker_container_name: pulp-worker

pulp_content_origin: "http://{{ ansible_fqdn }}:24816"
pulp_rhsm_url: "https://{{ ansible_fqdn }}/rhsm"
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I was debating this: if we don't expose the setting (or it has no value), how does Katello interpret this? It's defined here.

What if we enhance this that if it isn't set, Katello will show its own RHSM API URL? That way you can present a Pulp server without also the RHSM API. Because essentially this is really the {{ foreman_url }}/rhsm value unless it's a content proxy (which we don't support yet).

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Katello/katello#11328 takes a stab at that.

@evgeni evgeni added this to the 1.0 milestone Jun 23, 2025
@evgeni evgeni force-pushed the pulp-smart branch 2 times, most recently from e51b805 to 214dff7 Compare June 24, 2025 13:34
pulp_worker_container_name: pulp-worker

pulp_content_origin: "http://{{ ansible_fqdn }}:24816"
pulp_rhsm_url: "https://{{ ansible_fqdn }}/rhsm"
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

TODO: finish Katello/katello#11328 so this becomes optional.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yeah, but I wouldn't block on that. :)

@evgeni evgeni marked this pull request as ready for review June 24, 2025 14:02
@evgeni evgeni merged commit 306b10e into master Jun 24, 2025
5 checks passed
@evgeni evgeni deleted the pulp-smart branch June 24, 2025 14:37
@evgeni evgeni mentioned this pull request Nov 5, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants