Skip to content

API Implementation Documentation #318

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 31, 2025

Conversation

apricot13
Copy link
Collaborator

@apricot13 apricot13 commented Mar 3, 2025

Read it here!

This PR is to accompany the issue I raised here a while back (#296) I've stuck to just using markdown for now, following a "swagger-like" structure but I'm happy to switch to a different library or validator tool if there are any suggestions.

I've based the documentation on:

I've only covered the basics for now, we're starting work on comments first, then documents, then applications and then location based application searching.

I've put in a TODO at the bottom of the implementation page to spark as much discussion as possible before we implement those in the DPR and add to the documentation.

@apricot13 apricot13 force-pushed the hn/api-implementation-documentation branch 2 times, most recently from d622454 to 3515d51 Compare March 4, 2025 18:14
@apricot13 apricot13 force-pushed the hn/api-implementation-documentation branch from 3515d51 to aabc21a Compare March 12, 2025 17:14
Copy link
Member

@jessicamcinchak jessicamcinchak left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry have been slow to get to this one - thanks for clear guidelines & including this !

@apricot13 apricot13 force-pushed the hn/api-implementation-documentation branch from b82a6b2 to 1ff295b Compare March 31, 2025 11:16
@apricot13 apricot13 merged commit 7c2bf87 into main Mar 31, 2025
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants