Skip to content

Conversation

@jcmuller
Copy link

Closes #23

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings December 21, 2025 05:16
Copy link

@greptile-apps greptile-apps bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Your free trial has ended. If you'd like to continue receiving code reviews, you can add a payment method here.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @jcmuller, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request refines the commit formatting logic within the lib/common.sh script. It updates the display of commit IDs and consolidates the handling of various commit labels, aiming to improve the consistency and clarity of commit information presented to the user, thereby addressing issue #23.

Highlights

  • Commit ID Formatting: The function responsible for formatting short change IDs has been updated from format_short_change_id_with_hidden_and_divergent_info to format_short_change_id_with_change_offset.
  • Commit Labeling: The explicit check for commit conflicts and its associated label has been replaced by a more generalized format_commit_labels function, streamlining how various commit states are displayed.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request updates the commit formatting in lib/common.sh by changing how commit information is displayed in one-line logs. One of the changes, replacing an explicit conflict check with format_commit_labels(commit), introduces redundant labels for 'conflict' and 'immutable' states. These states are already indicated at the beginning of the log line. My feedback focuses on correcting this redundancy to ensure the output is clean and not confusing, while still incorporating the likely intended addition of a 'hidden' state label.

commit.working_copies(),
if(commit.git_head(), label("git_head", "git_head()")),
if(commit.conflict(), label("conflict", "conflict")),
format_commit_labels(commit),

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

high

The use of format_commit_labels(commit) here introduces redundant information in the commit one-line format. The ONELINE_COMMIT_BIGHEX template already adds labels for immutable/mutable (line 59) and conflicted (line 60) at the beginning of the line. The format_commit_labels() function, by default, also adds labels for conflict, immutable, and hidden states. This will result in duplicate labels in the output, for example, a conflicted commit will show conflicted at the start and conflict later in the line. This can be confusing.

If the goal is to add a label for hidden commits, it would be better to add it explicitly to avoid redundancy.

Suggested change
format_commit_labels(commit),
if(commit.hidden(), label("hidden", "hidden")),

Copy link

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This pull request updates the commit formatting template in lib/common.sh to use newer Jujutsu built-in template functions. The changes modernize the commit display format by replacing older template functions with their updated equivalents.

Key Changes

  • Replaced format_short_change_id_with_hidden_and_divergent_info() with format_short_change_id_with_change_offset() for displaying change IDs
  • Replaced inline conflict label conditional with format_commit_labels() function for better encapsulation

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

jj is changing internal templates

1 participant