Skip to content

Refactor process_utility to reduce reliance on compressed_chunk_id - #9960

Merged
svenklemm merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
sven/compressed_chunk_id2
Jun 4, 2026
Merged

Refactor process_utility to reduce reliance on compressed_chunk_id#9960
svenklemm merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
sven/compressed_chunk_id2

Conversation

@svenklemm

@svenklemm svenklemm commented Jun 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Using oid directly in process_utility allows us to skip some
catalog scans we would otherwise do when instantiating Chunk
object.

Disable-check: force-changelog-file

@github-actions
github-actions Bot requested review from akuzm and dbeck June 3, 2026 17:45
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jun 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@dbeck, @akuzm: please review this pull request.

Powered by pull-review

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Jun 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@svenklemm
svenklemm force-pushed the sven/compressed_chunk_id2 branch from b6cb118 to a793fe7 Compare June 4, 2026 11:16
@svenklemm svenklemm changed the title Refactor process_utility to remove reliance on compressed_chunk_id Refactor process_utility to reduce reliance on compressed_chunk_id Jun 4, 2026
@svenklemm
svenklemm force-pushed the sven/compressed_chunk_id2 branch 3 times, most recently from 18133ae to 9174d37 Compare June 4, 2026 13:13
Using oid directly in process_utility allows us to skip some
catalog scans we would otherwise do when instantiating Chunk
object.
@svenklemm
svenklemm force-pushed the sven/compressed_chunk_id2 branch from 9174d37 to 009ad6b Compare June 4, 2026 14:00
@svenklemm
svenklemm merged commit fd3c049 into main Jun 4, 2026
62 of 63 checks passed
@svenklemm
svenklemm deleted the sven/compressed_chunk_id2 branch June 4, 2026 14:30
@timescale-automation timescale-automation added the released-2.28.0 Released in 2.28.0 label Jun 16, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

released-2.28.0 Released in 2.28.0

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants