Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for new tlapm command-line syntax #1085

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

glondu
Copy link

@glondu glondu commented Nov 22, 2024

No description provided.

@lemmy
Copy link
Member

lemmy commented Nov 22, 2024

Follow-up of tlaplus/tlapm#177


command.add("--config");

return (String[]) command.toArray(new String[command.size()]);
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think there's any need for an awkward array conversion here. It should be possible to simplify this to return command; if you make the method return List<String> instead of String[]. The only use of this method is as an argument to new ProcessBuilder, and that constructor can take either String[] or List<String>.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Right. I just reproduced the constructCommand pattern already present in the same file. I will push a simplified version.

@glondu glondu force-pushed the support-for-tlapm-cmdline-api branch 2 times, most recently from 542b618 to c781c51 Compare November 25, 2024 07:49
@glondu glondu force-pushed the support-for-tlapm-cmdline-api branch from c781c51 to ea16f7a Compare November 25, 2024 07:53
@lemmy
Copy link
Member

lemmy commented Feb 27, 2025

IIRC, things changed over at the tlapm repo. What is the status of this PR?

@ahelwer
Copy link
Contributor

ahelwer commented Feb 27, 2025

This is no longer needed!

@lemmy lemmy closed this Feb 27, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants