Skip to content

Conversation

@lemmy
Copy link
Member

@lemmy lemmy commented Dec 5, 2025

  • Added extraJavaOpts parameter to allow users to specify custom Java options for the JVM.

This feature e.g. adds support for time-boxing the _check command.

[Feature]

@lemmy lemmy added enhancement New feature or request AI Work related to TLAi+ labels Dec 5, 2025
@lemmy lemmy force-pushed the mku-MCPExtraJavaOpts branch from d722176 to 46f8730 Compare December 5, 2025 01:01
@lemmy lemmy requested review from Copilot and younes-io December 5, 2025 01:13
Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR enhances the MCPServer to support custom Java options when executing TLC commands. The primary purpose is to enable users to pass JVM-specific options such as memory settings and timeouts, which is particularly useful for time-boxing model checking operations.

  • Added extraJavaOpts parameter to three TLC tool endpoints: tlaplus_mcp_tlc_check, tlaplus_mcp_tlc_simulate, and tlaplus_mcp_tlc_explore
  • Updated parameter schemas with clear descriptions and examples for the new Java options
  • Modified handler implementations to properly pass the Java options to the runTLCInMCP method

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

- Added `extraJavaOpts` parameter to allow users to specify custom Java options for the JVM.

This feature e.g. adds support for time-boxing the _check command.

[Feature]

Signed-off-by: Markus Alexander Kuppe <[email protected]>
@lemmy lemmy force-pushed the mku-MCPExtraJavaOpts branch from 46f8730 to 4e98b7f Compare December 5, 2025 01:17
@lemmy lemmy marked this pull request as ready for review December 5, 2025 17:01
@lemmy lemmy merged commit b5c5b9a into master Dec 5, 2025
4 checks passed
@lemmy lemmy deleted the mku-MCPExtraJavaOpts branch December 5, 2025 22:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

AI Work related to TLAi+ enhancement New feature or request

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants