Conversation
Managor
requested review from
kbdharun,
sbrl and
sebastiaanspeck
as code owners
github-actions
bot
added
the
documentation
kbdharun
approved these changes
Feb 17, 2026
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
Sorry, something went wrong.
ivanbaluta
approved these changes
Feb 17, 2026
Member
ivanbaluta
left a comment
ivanbaluta
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Although no, your wording is better
Managor
commented
Feb 17, 2026
znarfm
approved these changes
Feb 18, 2026
sebastiaanspeck
approved these changes
Feb 18, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The original wording feels like it implies that upstream has moved the command.
This change should make it clearer that it means that we moved it to another page. If you have better wording ideas, let me know.