changes according to Issue 451#457
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Reviewer's guide (collapsed on small PRs)Reviewer's GuideRefactors the Mikrotik options flow handler to consistently use the private Class diagram for updated MikrotikControllerOptionsFlowHandler config entry usageclassDiagram
class OptionsFlow
class MikrotikControllerOptionsFlowHandler {
- config_entry
- _config_entry
- options
+ MikrotikControllerOptionsFlowHandler(config_entry)
+ async_step_init(user_input)
+ async_step_basic_options(user_input)
+ async_step_sensor_select(user_input)
}
OptionsFlow <|-- MikrotikControllerOptionsFlowHandler
%% Before change: MikrotikControllerOptionsFlowHandler used public config_entry
%% After change: MikrotikControllerOptionsFlowHandler uses private _config_entry for all option defaults
File-Level Changes
Tips and commandsInteracting with Sourcery
Customizing Your ExperienceAccess your dashboard to:
Getting Help
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hey - I've left some high level feedback:
- If
_config_entryis meant to be an internal-only attribute, consider also renaming the constructor parameter to_config_entryor adding a short comment to clarify why this attribute was renamed fromconfig_entryto avoid confusion for future maintainers. - Consider adding a type annotation to
self._config_entryin__init__(e.g.,HomeAssistantType/ConfigEntryas appropriate) to make the purpose and expected shape of the stored config entry clearer for tooling and readers.
Prompt for AI Agents
Please address the comments from this code review:
## Overall Comments
- If `_config_entry` is meant to be an internal-only attribute, consider also renaming the constructor parameter to `_config_entry` or adding a short comment to clarify why this attribute was renamed from `config_entry` to avoid confusion for future maintainers.
- Consider adding a type annotation to `self._config_entry` in `__init__` (e.g., `HomeAssistantType`/`ConfigEntry` as appropriate) to make the purpose and expected shape of the stored config entry clearer for tooling and readers.Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Proposed change
Implemented changes by @jackomm in #451
I don't understand addition of
super().__init__(), it worked w/o that in my test too.Type of change
Additional information
Checklist
Summary by Sourcery
Bug Fixes: