Skip to content

Support Value.StrictEquals to Go. #106

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
May 21, 2025

Conversation

stroiman
Copy link

I have a bunch of changes, I never PR'ed - trying to rebase them into isolated PRs of independent functionality.

@stroiman stroiman force-pushed the add-value-strict-equals branch from 4ae15b2 to ef25b66 Compare May 20, 2025 10:52
Copy link
Owner

@tommie tommie left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just a very minor nit on style.

value_test.go Outdated
}

if !numberOne.StrictEquals(numberOneB) {
t.Fatalf("Number 1 and Number 1 should be strict equal")
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Since the following assertions are independent, using t.Errorf is appropriate.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed - as well as CHANGELOG conflict.

@stroiman stroiman force-pushed the add-value-strict-equals branch from 3c217d1 to b0b2845 Compare May 21, 2025 17:06
@tommie tommie merged commit c9a10f0 into tommie:master May 21, 2025
14 checks passed
@tommie
Copy link
Owner

tommie commented May 21, 2025

Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants