Fix pydantic_model_creator incompatibility with Pydantic 2.11 (#1925)

[C5H12O5]

Description

Modified the parameters passed to Pydantic's create_model method to ensure compatibility with Pydantic 2.11.

Motivation and Context

Fixes #1925

How Has This Been Tested?

make test

Checklist:

• My code follows the code style of this project.
• My change requires a change to the documentation.
• I have updated the documentation accordingly.
• I have added the changelog accordingly.
• I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
• I have added tests to cover my changes.
• All new and existing tests passed.

[Viicos]

Note that you can specify config in create_model() via the __config__ parameter.

[C5H12O5]

Thanks for the review. I did notice this parameter while checking the source code, but it seems __config__ cannot be used together with __base__.

[Viicos]

Hum, this limitation was introduced a really long time ago, when create_model() was added in pydantic/pydantic#125. I'm pretty sure this limitation can be removed now; it is possible to specify model_config on a subclass inheriting from (multiple) bases. This will be tracked in pydantic/pydantic#2137.

[commonism]

@Viicos pydantic I assume not accepting model_config as field parameter to create_model is a regression introduced in 2.11.0?

[Viicos]

If it was working before 2.11, this was by accident. The proper and documented way was (and still is) to provide configuration using the __config__ parameter.

[codspeed-hq]

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #1930 will not alter performance

_{Comparing C5H12O5:fix-pydantic-model-creator (cf61111) with develop (21463c7)}

Summary

✅ 16 untouched benchmarks

[coveralls]

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 14303714936

Details

• 10 of 10 (100.0%) changed or added relevant lines in 1 file are covered.
• No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
• Overall coverage increased (+0.01%) to 89.671%

---

Totals
Change from base Build 14102340932:	0.01%
Covered Lines:	6668
Relevant Lines:	7256

---

💛 - Coveralls

[Copilot]

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

Files not reviewed (1)

• CHANGELOG.rst: Language not supported

Comments suppressed due to low confidence (2)

tortoise/contrib/pydantic/creator.py:391

• [nitpick] Consider using hasattr(v, 'decorator_info') to check for the presence of a computed field attribute, which may more clearly express your intent.

if isinstance(getattr(v, "decorator_info", None), ComputedFieldInfo):

tortoise/contrib/pydantic/creator.py:402

• Verify that all necessary properties from self._properties are preserved when splitting into common_fields and computed_fields. Ensure that the base_model fully replicates the configuration required by downstream usage.

__base__=base_model,

[henadzit]

The change looks good to me, thank you for your contribution!

[commonism]

Hi,

I'm with you.
I figured not adding an annotation if the annotation for the field is None works as well.
pydantic/pydantic#11032 (comment)
Therefore my fix is duplicating create_model.
commonism/aiopenapi3@8916b46