Publish CAP Labs report

[sfmiller1]

No description provided.

[CLAassistant]

Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
_{You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.}

[claude]

Claude finished @sfmiller1's task —— View job

---

PR Review: Publish CAP Labs report

Todo List:

• Analyze the file being added
• Check repository structure and cataloguing requirements
• Review naming conventions and organization
• Provide comprehensive review feedback

Summary

This PR adds a security review report PDF but is incomplete - the file needs to be catalogued in the README.md to be discoverable.

Review Feedback

✅ What's Good

• Correct file naming: reviews/2025-05-caplabs-coveredagentprotocol-securityreview.pdf follows the repository's established naming convention
• Proper file location: PDF is placed in the correct reviews/ directory

❌ Issues Found

Critical: Missing README Entry

The security review is not catalogued in the main README.md file, making it undiscoverable to users. Based on the repository structure, this entry should be added to the #### Ethereum/EVM section under ## Security Reviews.

Required addition around line ~3830 in README.md (May 2025 entries):

| [CAP Labs Covered Agent Protocol](https://caplabs.xyz/) | May 2025 | [EFFORT_LEVEL] | | [📄](reviews/2025-05-caplabs-coveredagentprotocol-securityreview.pdf) |

Missing Information

The following details are needed for the complete catalogue entry:

• Level of Effort: Security review scope (e.g., "4" for 4 engineer-weeks)
• Company URL: Proper link to CAP Labs website (if available)
• Announcement link: If CAP Labs published an announcement about this audit

📋 Recommendations

1. Add README entry: Update the Ethereum/EVM section with the security review entry
2. Follow repository guidelines: Use 3-letter month abbreviation (May, not "May 2025" - the format should be "May 2025")
3. Maintain sort order: Ensure entries remain sorted by date (newest first)
4. Complete the story: Consider if there are any fix reviews or letters of attestation that should also be included

🔍 Additional Notes

• No code quality issues (PDF file only)
• No security concerns with file addition
• No performance impact
• No test coverage needed (documentation/asset addition)

Status: Needs additional work to complete the publication process.

[claude]

Claude finished @sfmiller1's task —— View job

---

PR Review: Publish CAP Labs report

Todo List:

• Analyze the file being added
• Check repository structure and cataloguing requirements
• Review naming conventions and organization
• Examine README.md changes in detail
• Verify compliance with CLAUDE.md guidelines
• Check date formatting and table structure
• Provide comprehensive review feedback

📋 Review Summary

This PR correctly adds the CAP Labs security review to the publications repository following established conventions.

✅ Strengths

1. File Naming Convention: The PDF file reviews/2025-05-caplabs-coveredagentprotocol-securityreview.pdf follows the exact naming pattern YYYY-MM-clientname-productname-securityreview.pdf

2. Proper Section Placement: Entry correctly added to the Ethereum/EVM section (README.md:700)

3. Chronological Ordering: Properly placed as the newest entry (May 2025) at the top of the table

4. Correct Table Format: All columns properly filled:

   • Product: [CAP Labs Covered Agent Protocol](https://cap.app/) with working link
   • Date: May 2025 (follows 3-letter abbreviation guideline)
   • Level of Effort: 9
   • Announcement: Empty (appropriate)
   • Report: [📄✅](reviews/...) with correct icons for security assessment + fix review

5. Document Icons: Uses 📄✅ correctly indicating security assessment report with fix review

💡 Minor Optimization Suggestions

1. Product Name Length: Consider shortening "CAP Labs Covered Agent Protocol" to "Covered Agent Protocol" to help table rows fit on single lines, per CLAUDE.md guidelines for keeping entries concise.

2. Link Verification: The https://cap.app/ link works correctly and points to the appropriate project.

🔍 Technical Review

• No Security Concerns: This is a documentation update adding a legitimate security review
• No Performance Impact: Simple table entry addition
• No Code Quality Issues: Proper markdown formatting maintained
• Test Coverage: N/A - documentation change only

✅ Compliance Check

All repository guidelines from CLAUDE.md are followed:

• ✅ Date formatting (3-letter abbreviation)
• ✅ Section organization (Security Reviews > Ethereum/EVM)
• ✅ Chronological sorting (newest first)
• ✅ Proper document icons
• ✅ Consistent table formatting

Recommendation: APPROVE - This is a clean, properly formatted addition that follows all repository conventions.