Publish Affluent (previously Factorial) reports

[sfmiller1]

No description provided.

[CLAassistant]

Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
_{You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.}

[claude]

Claude finished @sfmiller1's task —— View job

---

PR Review for Affluent Security Review Reports

I've completed my review of this PR that adds 2 Affluent security review reports.

Todo List:

• Read repository structure and current README.md
• Check Security Reviews section formatting and requirements
• Verify PDF file naming conventions
• Determine if README.md needs updates for these reports
• Provide comprehensive review feedback

🚨 Major Issue Found

Missing Documentation Updates: This PR adds PDF files but fails to update the README.md to document the new security reviews. According to the repository structure and guidelines, all security reviews must be properly documented in the Security Reviews section.

📋 Review Findings

✅ Code Quality & Best Practices

• File Naming: Both files follow the established naming convention: YYYY-MM-companyname-productname-securityreview.pdf
• File Placement: Correctly placed in the /reviews/ directory
• File Types: Standard PDF security review reports

🔍 Missing Requirements

• Documentation Gap: The TON section in README.md is missing entries for these reports:
  • 2025-02-affluent-tondefiprotocol-securityreview.pdf should be added between STON.fi (Jan 2025) and existing May 2025 entries
  • 2025-06-affluent-strategyvaultandrfqcontracts-securityreview.pdf should be added between FIVA reports (May 2025) and Swap Coffee (Jul 2025)

📊 Expected README.md Updates

The TON section should include:

| [Affluent Strategy Vault & RFQ](https://example.com/) | Jun 2025 | X | | [📄✅](reviews/2025-06-affluent-strategyvaultandrfqcontracts-securityreview.pdf) |
| [Affluent TON DeFi Protocol](https://example.com/) | Feb 2025 | X | | [📄✅](reviews/2025-02-affluent-tondefiprotocol-securityreview.pdf) |

🛡️ Security & Performance

• No Security Concerns: Only adding documentation files, no executable code
• No Performance Impact: Binary PDF additions don't affect application performance
• File Integrity: Files appear to be standard security review PDFs

🧪 Test Coverage

• N/A: No testable code changes in this PR

✅ Recommendation

Action Required: Update README.md to include proper documentation entries for both security reviews in the TON section, following the established format with appropriate dates, effort levels, and file links.