Add report and update readme

[le-miorcec]

No description provided.

[CLAassistant]

Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
_{You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.}

[claude]

Claude finished @le-miorcec's task —— View job

---

Pull Request Review

I'll review this PR that adds a StarkWare security review and updates the README.

Review Tasks:

• Read the modified README.md file
• Check the new PDF file location and naming
• Count StarkWare reviews to check Major Clients eligibility
• Verify compliance with repository guidelines from CLAUDE.md
• Review formatting and placement according to security review table guidelines
• Provide comprehensive feedback

---

Review Feedback

❌ Issues Found

1. Date Format Violation

• Issue: Uses "August 2025" instead of required "Aug 2025"
• CLAUDE.md Rule: "Use 3-letter abbreviations for all month names to save space in the layout"
• Fix: Change August 2025 to Aug 2025

2. Major Clients Section Requirement

• Issue: StarkWare now has 5+ reviews and should be moved to Major Clients section
• Current StarkWare Reviews:
  1. ✅ Starkware StarkEx Diff Review (Aug 2025) - this PR
  2. ✅ StarkEx (Oct 2022)
  3. ✅ StarkNet token (Jul 2022)
  4. ✅ StarkPerpetual (Jan 2022)
  5. ✅ StarkEx (Nov 2021)
• CLAUDE.md Rule: "Include clients with 5 or more security reviews"
• Required Changes:
  • Create "#### StarkWare" section in Major Clients (between Western Digital and AI/ML Reviews)
  • Move all 5 StarkWare reviews from Starknet section to new Major Clients section
  • Update table of contents to include StarkWare under Major Clients
  • Sort reviews by date (newest first)

3. Inconsistent Product Name

• Current: "Starkware StarkEx Diff Review"
• Suggested: "StarkEx Diff Review" (matches existing naming pattern for StarkEx entries)

✅ What's Done Well

• File Location: PDF correctly placed in /reviews/ directory
• File Naming: Follows proper convention: 2025-08-starkware-starkex-diff-review-securityreview.pdf
• Table Formatting: Proper markdown table structure and icon usage (📄)
• Sort Order: Correctly placed at top of section (newest first)
• Link Format: Proper link formatting to company website

📋 Required Changes Summary

1. Fix date format: August 2025 → Aug 2025
2. Create StarkWare Major Clients section with all 5 reviews:

   #### StarkWare
   
   | Product | Date | Level of <br />Effort | Announcement | Report |
   | ---| --: | :-: | --- | :-: |
   | [StarkEx Diff Review](https://starkware.co/starkex/) | Aug 2025 | 0.2 | | [📄](reviews/2025-08-starkware-starkex-diff-review-securityreview.pdf) |
   | [StarkEx](https://starkware.co/starkex/) | Oct 2022 | 1 | |  |
   | [StarkNet token](https://starkware.co/starknet/) | Jul 2022 | 1 | |  |
   | [StarkPerpetual](https://docs.starkware.co/starkex-v4/starkex-deep-dive/message-encodings/in-perpetual) | Jan 2022 | 8 | | |
   | [StarkEx](https://starkware.co/starkex/) | Nov 2021 | 8 | | |

3. Update table of contents to add - [StarkWare](#starkware) under Major Clients
4. Remove all 4 existing StarkWare reviews from Starknet section to avoid duplicates

The repository guidelines in CLAUDE.md are clear about Major Clients organization to maintain consistency across the publication list.