Skip to content

Missing Timestamp Validation in S3 Gateway Authentication

Moderate
zubron published GHSA-f2ph-gc9m-q55f Jan 15, 2026

Package

gomod lakefs (Go)

Affected versions

< 1.75.0

Patched versions

1.75.0

Description

Impact

LakeFS's S3 gateway does not validate timestamps in authenticated requests, allowing replay attacks. An attacker who captures a valid signed request (e.g., through network interception, logs, or compromised systems) can replay that request until credentials are rotated, even after the request is intended to expire.

Patches

This issue affects all versions of lakeFS up to and including v1.74.4.

The vulnerability has been fixed in version v1.75.0.

Users should upgrade to version v1.75.0.

Workarounds

Until upgraded, implement these mitigations:

  • Use short-lived credentials - Rotate access keys frequently and deactivate old keys. For regular requests, captured requests only work until rotation. For presigned URLs, they remain valid until the credentials used to create them are deactivated.
  • Network controls - Restrict S3 gateway access to trusted networks/IPs to limit where replay attacks can originate.

Note: These workarounds reduce risk but do not fully eliminate the vulnerability.

References

Severity

Moderate

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

CVE ID

CVE-2025-68671

Weaknesses

No CWEs