-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 137
Draft of entropy correction artificial viscosity #2700
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Review checklistThis checklist is meant to assist creators of PRs (to let them know what reviewers will typically look for) and reviewers (to guide them in a structured review process). Items do not need to be checked explicitly for a PR to be eligible for merging. Purpose and scope
Code quality
Documentation
Testing
Performance
Verification
Created with ❤️ by the Trixi.jl community. |
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2700 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 88.24% 95.91% +7.67%
==========================================
Files 550 553 +3
Lines 43421 43853 +432
==========================================
+ Hits 38313 42058 +3745
+ Misses 5108 1795 -3313
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
This PR is mainly intended as experimentation and brainstorming on how to implement ECAV in Trixi.
Ideally we would like to reuse the gradient calculations between
rhs_parabolic!andrhs!. Two assumptions:SplitODEProblemcallsrhs_parabolic!first, thenrhs!so that the viscous gradients are available torhs!, which would now need to take in acache_parabolicorviscous_containerargument.rhs!and should not be overly stiff.Since the
rhs!call signature changes, this probably requires a new Semidiscretization?Questions:
rhs_parabolic!to calculate gradients