more upstream tests

[ranocha]

@JoshuaLampert noticed that the TrixiAtmo.jl upstream tests did not fail in trixi-framework/Trixi.jl#2775 (review). The reason is that we did not check for warnings and ran only a few tests. Thus, I added additional checks for upstream CI runs.

[JoshuaLampert]

Ah, that makes sense. Thanks!

[JoshuaLampert]

Can you run the formatter, please?

[JoshuaLampert]

Thanks

[ranocha]

I don't know why exactly it failed before, but the additional upstream tests should be enough, I think.

[JoshuaLampert]

I don't know why exactly it failed before, but the additional upstream tests should be enough, I think.

I am not entirely sure, but the issue with the @test_trixi_include could have been the semicolon instead of a comma here and here.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 97.10%. Comparing base (ec70915) to head (11bc305).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #144   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   97.10%   97.10%           
=======================================
  Files          33       33           
  Lines        4558     4558           
=======================================
  Hits         4426     4426           
  Misses        132      132           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.