Refactor Graphviz component and improve code formatting #16
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@kamiazya has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 8 minutes and 46 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThe changes include the addition of a TypeScript SDK path configuration in Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 15
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (15)
src/theme/Root.tsx (1)
4-10: Well-structured component architecture.The Root component effectively implements the context sharing strategy mentioned in the PR objectives. The nested provider structure ensures that Graphviz and WebContainer instances are consistently available throughout the component tree, promoting better maintainability and efficiency.
src/components/Graphviz/index.tsx (1)
6-17: Add documentation for the engine prop and consider type refinement.The interface is well-structured, but the
engineprop lacks documentation explaining its purpose and available options.Consider applying this enhancement:
interface GraphvizProps { /** * A string containing a graph representation using the Graphviz DOT language. * @see https://graphviz.org/doc/info/lang.html */ dot: string; + /** + * The Graphviz layout engine to use for rendering. + * @see https://graphviz.org/docs/layouts/ + */ engine?: Engine; /** * The classname to attach to this component for styling purposes. */ className?: string; }src/contexts/Graphviz/index.tsx (2)
24-24: Remove console.log from production code.Console statements should not be present in production code.
- console.log('Graphviz loaded', instance.version()); + // Consider using a proper logging system if needed
1-51: Consider adding performance optimizations and documentation.While the implementation is solid, consider these architectural improvements:
- Add memoization for large graph renders
- Implement render queuing for multiple concurrent renders
- Add JSDoc documentation for the API consumers
- Consider adding a debug mode for development environments
Would you like me to provide specific implementation details for any of these improvements?
src/pages/playground/index.tsx (1)
Line range hint
8-21: Consider adding comments to the example script for better clarity.While the example script effectively demonstrates ts-graphviz usage, adding explanatory comments would help users understand the graph structure and attributes better.
const script = `import { digraph, attribute as _ } from 'ts-graphviz'; +// Create a directed graph showing ts-graphviz data flow digraph('state_machine', { [_.newrank]: true }, (g) => { + // Set default node shape for all nodes g.node({ shape: 'circle' }); + // Define edges between different states with their operations g.edge(['Model', 'DOT'], { [_.label]: 'toDot', [_.constraint]: false }); g.edge(['AST', 'DOT'], { [_.label]: 'stringify' }); g.edge(['DOT', 'AST'], { [_.label]: 'parse' }); g.edge(['Model', 'AST'], { [_.label]: 'fromModel' }); g.edge(['AST', 'Model'], { [_.label]: 'toModel' }); g.edge(['DOT', 'Model'], { [_.label]: 'fromDot', [_.constraint]: false }); }); `;src/components/TSGraphvizLiveEditor/index.tsx (2)
Line range hint
43-71: Consider refactoring the resize logic for better maintainabilityThe auto-resize implementation could be improved in several ways:
- Extract the resize logic into a separate hook or utility
- Make height constraints configurable via props
- Add debouncing to the resize function for better performance
Here's a suggested refactor:
interface EditorSizeConfig { minHeight?: number; maxHeight?: number; padding?: number; } const useEditorResize = ( editor: editor.IStandaloneCodeEditor, config: EditorSizeConfig = {}, ) => { const { minHeight = 100, maxHeight = 500, padding = 10, } = config; const resize = useCallback( debounce(() => { const lineHeight = editor.getOption( monaco.editor.EditorOption.lineHeight, ); const currentLayout = editor.getLayoutInfo(); const newHeight = Math.min( Math.max( editor.getModel().getLineCount() * lineHeight + padding, minHeight, ), maxHeight, ); editor.layout({ height: newHeight, width: currentLayout.contentWidth, }); }, 100), [editor, minHeight, maxHeight, padding], ); return resize; };
Line range hint
72-97: Add error handling and optimize TypeScript configuration setupThe TypeScript configuration setup could be improved with proper error handling and performance optimizations.
Consider these improvements:
useEffect(() => { if (monaco) { + const compilerOptions = { + moduleResolution: + monaco.languages.typescript.ModuleResolutionKind.NodeJs, + allowNonTsExtensions: true, + }; + monaco.languages.typescript.typescriptDefaults.setEagerModelSync(true); - monaco.languages.typescript.typescriptDefaults.setCompilerOptions({ - moduleResolution: - monaco.languages.typescript.ModuleResolutionKind.NodeJs, - allowNonTsExtensions: true, - }); + monaco.languages.typescript.typescriptDefaults.setCompilerOptions(compilerOptions); + fetch(dtsUrl) .then((res) => res.json()) .then((libs) => { monaco.languages.typescript.typescriptDefaults.setExtraLibs(libs); }) + .catch((error) => { + console.error('Failed to load TypeScript definitions:', error); + // Optionally show user-friendly error message + }); + monaco.languages.typescript.typescriptDefaults.setDiagnosticsOptions({ noSemanticValidation: false, noSyntaxValidation: false, }); } - }, [monaco]); + }, [monaco, dtsUrl]);src/contexts/WebContainer/index.tsx (3)
35-35: Consider removing or adjusting debug logging statementsThe
console.log('jsCode', jsCode);statement may expose internal code details or clutter the console output. Consider removing it or using a logging mechanism that respects the application's logging level.
116-116: Remove unnecessary console logs inrunmethodThe
console.log('run', script, instance, status);statement may output sensitive information and is likely intended for debugging. Remove it to clean up the console output in production.
64-64: Initializestatusstate with a default valueThe
statusstate is initiallyundefined, which may lead to inconsistent state handling. Consider initializing it with a default value like'booting'or'booted'to ensure predictable behavior.Apply this diff to set an initial status:
- const [status, setStatus] = useState<Status>(); + const [status, setStatus] = useState<Status>('booting');Also, update the
Statustype accordingly:- type Status = 'booted' | 'installing' | 'ready' | 'processing'; + type Status = 'booting' | 'booted' | 'installing' | 'ready' | 'processing' | 'error';src/components/TSGraphvizPreviewEditor/index.tsx (5)
42-48: RemovesetDotfromuseCallbackdependenciesThe
setDotfunction fromuseStateis stable and does not change between renders. Including it in the dependency array ofrunis unnecessary and may cause redundant re-creations of the callback.Apply this diff to update the dependencies:
- }, [container.status, container.run, tsCode, setDot]); + }, [container.status, container.run, tsCode]);
43-43: Removeconsole.logdebugging statementThe
console.logstatement is useful during development but should be removed or replaced with proper logging before production to avoid cluttering the console output.Apply this diff to remove the debugging statement:
- console.log('run', tsCode, container.status);
33-38: Consider removingsetTsCodefromuseCallbackdependenciesThe
setTsCodefunction is stable and does not need to be included in the dependency array ofonChangeCallback. Omitting it can prevent unnecessary re-creations of the callback.Apply this diff to update the dependencies:
- [setTsCode], + [],
68-68: Remove unusedonMountpropThe
onMountprop is set to an empty function. If it's not needed, consider removing it to simplify the component and improve readability.Apply this diff to remove the unused prop:
className={styles.editor} - onMount={() => {}} onChange={onChangeCallback}
123-123: Clean up commented-out<option>in the engine selectorThe commented-out
<option>for"cicro"adds unnecessary clutter to the code. If this option is not intended for future use, consider removing it entirely.Apply this diff to clean up the code:
- {/* <option value="cicro">cicro</option> */}
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (12)
.vscode/settings.json(1 hunks)i18n/ja/code.json(1 hunks)package.json(3 hunks)src/components/Graphviz/index.tsx(1 hunks)src/components/TSGraphvizLiveEditor/index.tsx(3 hunks)src/components/TSGraphvizLiveEditor/styles.module.css(1 hunks)src/components/TSGraphvizPreviewEditor/index.tsx(5 hunks)src/components/TSGraphvizPreviewEditor/styles.module.css(2 hunks)src/contexts/Graphviz/index.tsx(1 hunks)src/contexts/WebContainer/index.tsx(1 hunks)src/pages/playground/index.tsx(1 hunks)src/theme/Root.tsx(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- .vscode/settings.json
- src/components/TSGraphvizLiveEditor/styles.module.css
🔇 Additional comments (16)
src/theme/Root.tsx (2)
1-2: LGTM! Clean and well-organized imports.
The imports are properly structured using absolute paths with the @site alias.
12-12: LGTM! Proper export statement.
The default export follows React component conventions.
src/components/TSGraphvizPreviewEditor/styles.module.css (6)
4-4: LGTM! Improved flex container layout
The changes enhance the layout stability by:
- Adding consistent spacing between flex items
- Ensuring equal distribution of space with proper flex properties
- Preventing overflow with width constraints
Also applies to: 8-11
13-18: LGTM! Well-structured editor container
The new editor container provides proper vertical organization with appropriate spacing and height utilization.
20-21: LGTM! Consistent flex behavior
The editor flex properties now match the container child properties, ensuring consistent layout behavior.
39-45: LGTM! Well-structured header layout
The new graphviz header follows good layout practices with proper spacing and alignment.
52-52: LGTM! Proper height utilization
Setting full height ensures proper display of graphviz content within its container.
26-26: Verify the intended visual order of action menu items
The change to flex-direction: row-reverse will reverse the visual order of menu items. Please confirm this is the intended behavior for user interaction.
Also applies to: 28-28
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more specific information about the action menu implementation and its visual order.
Row-reverse is appropriate for single-button action menu
Based on the component implementation, the action menu only contains a single "Run" button. The flex-direction: row-reverse change is appropriate here as it's likely being used for layout alignment purposes rather than affecting any interactive element ordering, since there's only one button to display.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any accessibility or UX related comments about the action menu
rg -l "action.*menu" . | xargs rg -l "accessibility|user|interaction|UX"
Length of output: 541
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the component implementation and related files
fd TSGraphvizPreviewEditor --exec rg -A 5 -B 5 "action.*menu|toolbar|button" {}
# Also check for any test files that might describe the expected behavior
fd "TSGraphvizPreviewEditor.*test|spec" --exec cat {}
Length of output: 1645
src/components/Graphviz/index.tsx (1)
35-35: LGTM!
The exports are clean and follow React best practices by exporting both the component and its TypeScript interface.
src/pages/playground/index.tsx (2)
4-4: LGTM! Import cleanup looks good.
The simplified import of translate function aligns well with its current usage in the component.
Line range hint 23-42: Verify documentation availability after removing usage instructions.
The removal of the Admonition component with usage instructions might impact user experience. Let's verify if these instructions are available elsewhere in the documentation.
✅ Verification successful
The removal of usage instructions from the playground is acceptable
The documentation provides comprehensive coverage of ts-graphviz usage through:
- Interactive examples in the Core Features section
- Detailed Basic Concepts and Usage guide with code samples
- Visual representations and explanations in the getting started documentation
The removed Admonition component's instructions are well-covered in the main documentation, making the playground interface cleaner without compromising user guidance.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for usage instructions in documentation files
# Expected: Find alternative location of usage instructions
# Look for usage instructions in markdown files
echo "Searching for usage instructions in documentation..."
rg -t md "usage|instructions|getting started" docs/
# Check if there are any admonition blocks with usage instructions in other files
echo "Checking for usage instructions in other components..."
rg "Admonition.*usage" src/
Length of output: 745
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for more comprehensive documentation about playground usage
# Search for playground-related documentation and instructions
echo "Searching for playground documentation..."
rg -i "playground.*instructions|playground.*usage|playground.*guide" --type md
# Check if there's a dedicated playground documentation
echo "Checking for dedicated playground docs..."
fd -e md -e mdx playground
# Look for any README or documentation in playground directory
echo "Looking for README in playground directory..."
fd -g "*README*" -g "*guide*" -g "*docs*" playground
# Check for any tutorial or help content in playground components
echo "Checking for tutorial/help content in playground components..."
rg -t tsx -t jsx "tutorial|help|guide|instruction" src/pages/playground/
Length of output: 894
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find playground-related documentation and help content
# Search for any documentation about playground usage in the entire codebase
echo "Searching for playground-related content..."
rg -l -i "playground" docs/ || true
# Look for help or tutorial content in playground components with correct file extension
echo "Checking for help content in playground components..."
rg -t ts -t js -t jsx "tutorial|help|guide|instruction" src/pages/playground/
# Check if there's any documentation in website docs
echo "Checking website documentation..."
fd -e md -e mdx . docs/
# Look for any UI elements that might contain help text
echo "Checking for UI help elements..."
rg "help|tutorial|instruction" src/pages/playground/
Length of output: 1592
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the content of core features and getting started docs that might contain playground information
# Check content of core features documentation
echo "Checking core features documentation..."
cat "docs/ts-graphviz/02-core-features/index.md"
# Check content of getting started docs
echo "Checking basic concepts and usage documentation..."
cat "docs/ts-graphviz/01-getting-started/03-basic-concepts-and-usage.md"
# Let's also check if there are any examples in the codebase
echo "Checking for example code..."
rg -l "example" src/pages/playground/
# Check for any editor-related help or documentation
echo "Checking for editor documentation..."
rg -l "editor|preview" docs/ts-graphviz/
Length of output: 8174
package.json (1)
29-29: LGTM! Good choice using WebAssembly-based Graphviz implementation.
The addition of @hpcc-js/wasm-graphviz and its corresponding types is a solid choice as it provides better performance through WebAssembly compared to pure JavaScript implementations.
Also applies to: 51-51
src/components/TSGraphvizLiveEditor/index.tsx (3)
3-9: LGTM: Import organization and type safety improvements
The reorganized imports with explicit type imports from Monaco editor enhance type safety. The addition of clsx is appropriate for handling conditional class names.
Also applies to: 13-13
16-20: LGTM: Props interface improvements
The Props interface updates improve type safety by using Monaco's built-in types and add necessary flexibility with the className prop. The optional nature of the props is correctly maintained.
98-117: LGTM: Clean and efficient editor configuration
The Monaco editor configuration is well-structured with appropriate options for a code editor. The conditional rendering and className handling are implemented correctly.
i18n/ja/code.json (1)
540-553: LGTM! Translations are accurate and well-structured.
The new Japanese translations for the Graphviz component UI elements are accurate and maintain consistency with Japanese UI conventions. Technical terms like "DOT" and placeholders like "{version}" are correctly preserved.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
src/components/Graphviz/index.tsx (2)
1-1: Remove commented code.The commented import of d3-graphviz should be removed as it's no longer used and the codebase has been migrated to use
@hpcc-js/wasm-graphviz.-// import { type GraphvizOptions, graphviz } from 'd3-graphviz';
41-61: Enhance accessibility with ARIA labels.Add appropriate ARIA labels to improve accessibility for error and loading states.
- <div className="error"> + <div className="error" role="alert" aria-live="polite"> {translate( { message: 'Failed to render graph: {message}', }, { message: error.message }, )} </div> ) : graphviz.status !== 'ready' ? ( - <div className="loading"> + <div className="loading" role="status" aria-live="polite"> {translate( { message: 'Loading...', }, )} </div> ) : url ? ( <img src={url} alt={`Graph visualization: ${dot.slice(0, 50)}...`} />i18n/ja/code.json (1)
540-559: Consider adding descriptions for new entriesMany existing entries in the file include a "description" field to provide context for translators. Consider adding descriptions for the new entries to maintain consistency and help future maintenance.
Example addition:
"Run": { - "message": "実行" + "message": "実行", + "description": "Label for the button that executes graph rendering" },
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
i18n/ja/code.json(1 hunks)package.json(1 hunks)src/components/Graphviz/index.tsx(1 hunks)src/theme/Root.tsx(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- package.json
- src/theme/Root.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (6)
src/components/Graphviz/index.tsx (2)
7-18: LGTM! Well-documented interface.
The GraphvizProps interface is well-structured and includes helpful JSDoc documentation for its properties.
66-66: LGTM! Clean exports.
The exports are well-structured, making both the component and its type definition available for consumers.
i18n/ja/code.json (4)
540-541: LGTM: Action button translation
The translation "実行" for "Run" is accurate and follows common Japanese UI conventions.
543-548: LGTM: Configuration labels translations
The translations for layout engine ("レイアウトエンジン:") and version information are accurate. The {version} variable placeholder is correctly preserved in the translation.
549-554: LGTM: View mode labels translations
The translations for "Image" (画像) and "DOT" are appropriate. Keeping "DOT" untranslated is the correct choice as it's a technical term.
555-559: LGTM: Status messages translations
The error and loading state translations are accurate and natural:
- Error message preserves the
{message}variable placeholder correctly - Loading message uses the common Japanese term "ローディング" which is widely understood
This pull request refactors the Graphviz component and improves the code formatting. It includes the following changes:
Shares instances with context
Refactors the Graphviz component
Improves code formatting
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Graphvizcomponent for rendering graphs using the Graphviz DOT language.TSGraphvizLiveEditorcomponent with enhanced props for better customization and event handling.TSGraphvizPreviewEditorcomponent for previewing Graphviz outputs.Localization Updates
Styling Enhancements
Dependencies
@hpcc-js/wasm-graphviz.