Search results

Ambiguous what "promises" are referred to

Status: Open.

#30 In twitter/innovators-patent-agreement;

· tieguy opened on Oct 7, 2013

Should inventor in "heirs of an inventor" sentence be capitalized?

Status: Open.

#28 In twitter/innovators-patent-agreement;

· tieguy opened on Oct 7, 2013

2(b)

Status: Open.

#25 In twitter/innovators-patent-agreement;

· idmw opened on Nov 23, 2012

Updated status?

Status: Open.

#24 In twitter/innovators-patent-agreement;

· tarul opened on Sep 13, 2012

Has this been past a patent lawyer?

Status: Open.

#22 In twitter/innovators-patent-agreement;

· digulla opened on May 16, 2012

Fix Twitter's Standing to Sue

Status: Open.

#20 In twitter/innovators-patent-agreement;

· jorgemtorres opened on Apr 24, 2012

Is Inventors (and heirs) right to sublicense necessary?

Status: Open.

#18 In twitter/innovators-patent-agreement;

· tarul opened on Apr 20, 2012

Patent Troll who copies to provoke patent infringement claim

Status: Open.

#11 In twitter/innovators-patent-agreement;

· nicfulton opened on Apr 18, 2012

Inventors, or inventors, their successors, assignees, etc?

Status: Open.

#9 In twitter/innovators-patent-agreement;

· stephan-buckmaster opened on Apr 18, 2012

Son (or Daughter) of Twitter

Status: Open.

#7 In twitter/innovators-patent-agreement;

· DavePitinga opened on Apr 17, 2012

I think the solution is elsewhere: treat ALL patents as RANDR by requirement of law.

Status: Open.

#4 In twitter/innovators-patent-agreement;

· BrazilianJoe opened on Apr 17, 2012

2(b) defines "defensively" differently; should use the same definition

Status: Open.

#2 In twitter/innovators-patent-agreement;

· joshtriplett opened on Apr 17, 2012