Eloqdoc vs Mongodb Articles #158
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
WalkthroughAdds two new blog posts comparing EloqDoc and MongoDB (Part 1: Architecture and Part 2: Feature Comparison). Each post includes a new MDX page with exported metadata and both posts are registered in the blog data registry with a shared cover image and featured flags. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)(omitted — changes are content additions without new multi-component control flow) Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes Possibly related PRs
Pre-merge checks❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
🧰 Additional context used🧠 Learnings (3)📚 Learning: 2024-12-04T09:02:22.583ZApplied to files:
📚 Learning: 2024-11-21T12:59:54.908ZApplied to files:
📚 Learning: 2025-01-01T16:01:41.716ZApplied to files:
🪛 LanguageToolsrc/app/blog/eloqdoc-vs-mongodb-architecture-and-design/page.mdx[grammar] ~92-~92: Ensure spelling is correct (QB_NEW_EN_ORTHOGRAPHY_ERROR_IDS_1) [grammar] ~124-~124: Use a hyphen to join words. (QB_NEW_EN_HYPHEN) [grammar] ~124-~124: Use a hyphen to join words. (QB_NEW_EN_HYPHEN) src/app/blog/eloqdoc-vs-mongodb-feature-comparison/page.mdx[style] ~59-~59: ‘a majority of’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative. (EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_A_MAJORITY_OF) [style] ~210-~210: ‘in conjunction with’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative. (EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_IN_CONJUNCTION_WITH) [style] ~231-~231: ‘a majority of’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative. (EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_A_MAJORITY_OF) [style] ~233-~233: ‘a majority of’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative. (EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_A_MAJORITY_OF) [style] ~235-~235: ‘in conjunction with’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative. (EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_IN_CONJUNCTION_WITH) 🔇 Additional comments (2)
Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/app/blog/eloqdoc-vs-mongodb-part1/page.mdx (1)
125-125: Optional: Add hyphens for compound modifier.For improved readability, consider hyphenating "single-primary per-shard model" since it's a compound modifier.
🔎 Suggested refinement
- MongoDB's single-primary per shard model means writes are naturally ordered on that primary, simplifying conflict resolution on that shard (at the cost of that primary being a choke point). + MongoDB's single-primary per-shard model means writes are naturally ordered on that primary, simplifying conflict resolution on that shard (at the cost of that primary being a choke point).
📜 Review details
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (4)
src/app/blog/eloqdoc-vs-mongodb-part1/cover.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngsrc/app/blog/eloqdoc-vs-mongodb-part1/image1.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngsrc/app/blog/eloqdoc-vs-mongodb-part1/image2.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngsrc/app/blog/eloqdoc-vs-mongodb-part1/image3.pngis excluded by!**/*.png
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
src/app/blog/data.tssrc/app/blog/eloqdoc-vs-mongodb-part1/page.mdx
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
src/app/blog/eloqdoc-vs-mongodb-part1/page.mdx
[grammar] ~93-~93: Ensure spelling is correct
Context: ...grations can impact performance. 3. The mongos routers and config servers are addition...
(QB_NEW_EN_ORTHOGRAPHY_ERROR_IDS_1)
[grammar] ~125-~125: Use a hyphen to join words.
Context: ...t protocol. MongoDB’s single-primary per shard model means writes are natural...
(QB_NEW_EN_HYPHEN)
[grammar] ~125-~125: Use a hyphen to join words.
Context: ...otocol. MongoDB’s single-primary per shard model means writes are naturally o...
(QB_NEW_EN_HYPHEN)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
- GitHub Check: build (18.x)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
src/app/blog/eloqdoc-vs-mongodb-part1/page.mdx (4)
21-25: LGTM!The BlogHeader configuration is consistent with the metadata and the blog entry in
data.ts.
93-93: Note: "mongos" is correct MongoDB terminology.The static analysis tool flagged "mongos" as a potential spelling error, but this is the correct technical term for MongoDB's query router service. No change needed.
27-136: LGTM! Well-researched and balanced content.The architectural comparison is technically sound, well-structured, and provides a balanced perspective on both EloqDoc and MongoDB. The explanations of key concepts (compute/storage separation, sharding, replication) are clear and accurate.
137-147: LGTM! Strong conclusion.The conclusion effectively summarizes the architectural trade-offs and provides practical guidance for choosing between the two systems. The reference to Part 2 sets up the series well.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
src/app/blog/eloqdoc-vs-mongodb-part1/page.mdx (1)
6-6: Remove unusedRelatedPostsimport.The
RelatedPostscomponent is imported but not used anywhere in the file.
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/app/blog/data.ts (1)
22-47: Consider the ordering of blog entries.Part 2 is listed before Part 1 in the
allBlogsarray. While this may be intentional for blog feed display (showing most recent first), ensure this aligns with your desired presentation order, especially if readers should start with Part 1.src/app/blog/eloqdoc-vs-mongodb-part2/page.mdx (1)
6-6: Remove unusedRelatedPostsimport.The
RelatedPostscomponent is imported but not used anywhere in this file.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (20)
src/app/blog/eloqdoc-vs-mongodb-part2/cover.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngsrc/app/blog/eloqdoc-vs-mongodb-part2/image1.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngsrc/app/blog/eloqdoc-vs-mongodb-part2/image10.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngsrc/app/blog/eloqdoc-vs-mongodb-part2/image11.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngsrc/app/blog/eloqdoc-vs-mongodb-part2/image12.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngsrc/app/blog/eloqdoc-vs-mongodb-part2/image13.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngsrc/app/blog/eloqdoc-vs-mongodb-part2/image14.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngsrc/app/blog/eloqdoc-vs-mongodb-part2/image15.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngsrc/app/blog/eloqdoc-vs-mongodb-part2/image16.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngsrc/app/blog/eloqdoc-vs-mongodb-part2/image17.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngsrc/app/blog/eloqdoc-vs-mongodb-part2/image18.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngsrc/app/blog/eloqdoc-vs-mongodb-part2/image19.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngsrc/app/blog/eloqdoc-vs-mongodb-part2/image2.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngsrc/app/blog/eloqdoc-vs-mongodb-part2/image3.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngsrc/app/blog/eloqdoc-vs-mongodb-part2/image4.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngsrc/app/blog/eloqdoc-vs-mongodb-part2/image5.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngsrc/app/blog/eloqdoc-vs-mongodb-part2/image6.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngsrc/app/blog/eloqdoc-vs-mongodb-part2/image7.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngsrc/app/blog/eloqdoc-vs-mongodb-part2/image8.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngsrc/app/blog/eloqdoc-vs-mongodb-part2/image9.pngis excluded by!**/*.png
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
src/app/blog/data.tssrc/app/blog/eloqdoc-vs-mongodb-part1/page.mdxsrc/app/blog/eloqdoc-vs-mongodb-part2/page.mdx
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (3)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: tyaga001
Repo: tyaga001/devtoolsacademy PR: 31
File: posts/neon-vs-supabase.mdx:553-555
Timestamp: 2024-11-21T12:59:54.908Z
Learning: In `posts/neon-vs-supabase.mdx`, the external links at lines 553-555 are valid and accessible.
📚 Learning: 2024-12-04T09:02:22.583Z
Learnt from: tyaga001
Repo: tyaga001/devtoolsacademy PR: 45
File: src/components/Footer.tsx:15-24
Timestamp: 2024-12-04T09:02:22.583Z
Learning: When verifying the accessibility of blog post URLs in `src/components/Footer.tsx`, ensure that accessible URLs are not incorrectly flagged as inaccessible. Double-check the URLs before reporting accessibility issues.
Applied to files:
src/app/blog/data.tssrc/app/blog/eloqdoc-vs-mongodb-part1/page.mdx
📚 Learning: 2024-11-21T12:59:54.908Z
Learnt from: tyaga001
Repo: tyaga001/devtoolsacademy PR: 31
File: posts/neon-vs-supabase.mdx:553-555
Timestamp: 2024-11-21T12:59:54.908Z
Learning: In `posts/neon-vs-supabase.mdx`, the external links at lines 553-555 are valid and accessible.
Applied to files:
src/app/blog/eloqdoc-vs-mongodb-part1/page.mdx
🪛 LanguageTool
src/app/blog/eloqdoc-vs-mongodb-part2/page.mdx
[style] ~60-~60: ‘a majority of’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ...ncern: "majority" ensure the data is on a majority of replicas (preventing rollback on primar...
(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_A_MAJORITY_OF)
[style] ~211-~211: ‘in conjunction with’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ...e utilises hybrid logical clocks (HLCs) in conjunction with its own timestamping mechanism. This a...
(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_IN_CONJUNCTION_WITH)
[style] ~232-~232: ‘a majority of’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ...ds a single point of failure as long as a majority of nodes remain active, for instance, in a...
(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_A_MAJORITY_OF)
[style] ~234-~234: ‘a majority of’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ...new primary if a region fails, provided a majority of nodes are preserved. EloqDoc’s archite...
(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_A_MAJORITY_OF)
[style] ~236-~236: ‘in conjunction with’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ...s shared durable storage (object store) in conjunction with caching. The object storage (e.g., S3) ...
(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_IN_CONJUNCTION_WITH)
src/app/blog/eloqdoc-vs-mongodb-part1/page.mdx
[grammar] ~93-~93: Ensure spelling is correct
Context: ...grations can impact performance. 3. The mongos routers and config servers are addition...
(QB_NEW_EN_ORTHOGRAPHY_ERROR_IDS_1)
[grammar] ~125-~125: Use a hyphen to join words.
Context: ...t protocol. MongoDB’s single-primary per shard model means writes are natural...
(QB_NEW_EN_HYPHEN)
[grammar] ~125-~125: Use a hyphen to join words.
Context: ...otocol. MongoDB’s single-primary per shard model means writes are naturally o...
(QB_NEW_EN_HYPHEN)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/app/blog/eloqdoc-vs-mongodb-part1/page.mdx (1)
35-35: No issues found. All external links in the article are accessible and point to correct destinations:
- https://github.com/eloqdata/eloqdoc (line 35) — public repository
- https://github.com/mongodb (line 74) — valid GitHub org page
- https://www.eloqdata.com/product/eloqdoc (line 145) — product page with available downloads
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/app/blog/data.ts (2)
13-13: Consider consistent casing in import name.The import name uses
EloqdocVSMongoDB(lowercase 'd'), but the article titles consistently use "EloqDoc" (uppercase 'D'). While this doesn't affect functionality, renaming toEloqDocVSMongoDBwould improve consistency.🔎 Proposed refactor
-import EloqdocVSMongoDB from "@/app/blog/eloqdoc-vs-mongodb-part1/cover.png" +import EloqDocVSMongoDB from "@/app/blog/eloqdoc-vs-mongodb-part1/cover.png"Then update references on lines 31 and 44:
- image: EloqdocVSMongoDB.src, + image: EloqDocVSMongoDB.src,
22-47: Consider reordering entries and aligning isNew flags.Two observations:
Ordering: Part 2 appears before Part 1 in the array. For a multi-part series published on the same date, consider placing Part 1 first so readers encounter articles in logical sequence.
Inconsistent isNew flags: Part 1 has
isNew: truewhile Part 2 hasisNew: false, despite both being published on "2026-01-02T00:00:00Z". For consistency, both should have the sameisNewvalue.🔎 Proposed fix
Swap the order and align the flags:
export const allBlogs = [ { author: "Ankur Tyagi", - slug: "eloqdoc-vs-mongodb-feature-comparison", - title: "EloqDoc vs MongoDB - Part 2: Feature-by-Feature Comparison", - excerpt: "Feature-by-feature comparison of EloqDoc and MongoDB capabilities", + slug: "eloqdoc-vs-mongodb-architecture-and-design", + title: "EloqDoc vs MongoDB - Part 1: Architecture and Design Overview", + excerpt: "An overview of EloqDoc and MongoDB architecture", description: - "A detailed comparison of key features including transactions, indexing, consistency guarantees, and query capabilities. This part highlights where the two databases overlap and where their design philosophies clearly diverge in real world usage.", + "This article breaks down the core architecture of EloqDoc and MongoDB. It focuses on storage layout, replication model, and how each system is designed to scale. The goal is to understand what tradeoffs were made at the foundation level before looking at features or performance.", publishedAt: "2026-01-02T00:00:00Z", category: "Databases", image: EloqdocVSMongoDB.src, - isNew: false, + isNew: true, isFeatured: true, }, { author: "Ankur Tyagi", - slug: "eloqdoc-vs-mongodb-architecture-and-design", - title: "EloqDoc vs MongoDB - Part 1: Architecture and Design Overview", - excerpt: "An overview of EloqDoc and MongoDB architecture", + slug: "eloqdoc-vs-mongodb-feature-comparison", + title: "EloqDoc vs MongoDB - Part 2: Feature-by-Feature Comparison", + excerpt: "Feature-by-feature comparison of EloqDoc and MongoDB capabilities", description: - "This article breaks down the core architecture of EloqDoc and MongoDB. It focuses on storage layout, replication model, and how each system is designed to scale. The goal is to understand what tradeoffs were made at the foundation level before looking at features or performance.", + "A detailed comparison of key features including transactions, indexing, consistency guarantees, and query capabilities. This part highlights where the two databases overlap and where their design philosophies clearly diverge in real world usage.", publishedAt: "2026-01-02T00:00:00Z", category: "Databases", image: EloqdocVSMongoDB.src, isNew: true, isFeatured: true, },
📜 Review details
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/app/blog/data.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (1)
📚 Learning: 2024-12-04T09:02:22.583Z
Learnt from: tyaga001
Repo: tyaga001/devtoolsacademy PR: 45
File: src/components/Footer.tsx:15-24
Timestamp: 2024-12-04T09:02:22.583Z
Learning: When verifying the accessibility of blog post URLs in `src/components/Footer.tsx`, ensure that accessible URLs are not incorrectly flagged as inaccessible. Double-check the URLs before reporting accessibility issues.
Applied to files:
src/app/blog/data.ts
🪛 GitHub Actions: Node.js CI
src/app/blog/data.ts
[error] 26-26: prettier/prettier: Insert ⏎ newline at line 26 (formatting issue detected by Prettier).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
src/app/blog/data.ts (1)
13-13: Consider importing Part 2's cover image separately.The import references the Part 1 folder (
eloqdoc-vs-mongodb-architecture-and-design), and both blog entries use the sameEloqdocVSMongoDB.src. If Part 2 has its own cover image atsrc/app/blog/eloqdoc-vs-mongodb-feature-comparison/cover.png, consider importing and using it for visual distinction between the articles.
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/app/blog/eloqdoc-vs-mongodb-architecture-and-design/page.mdx (1)
5-5: Unused import:Calloutis imported but never used.The
Calloutcomponent is imported but not utilized anywhere in this article. Consider removing it to keep imports clean.🔎 Proposed fix
import { getMetadata } from "@/lib/metadata" import BlogHeader from "@/components/blog/BlogHeader" -import { Callout } from "@/components/blog/Callout"src/app/blog/eloqdoc-vs-mongodb-feature-comparison/page.mdx (1)
5-5: Unused import:Calloutis imported but never used.Similar to Part 1, the
Calloutcomponent is imported but not utilized in this article.🔎 Proposed fix
import { getMetadata } from "@/lib/metadata" import BlogHeader from "@/components/blog/BlogHeader" -import { Callout } from "@/components/blog/Callout"
📜 Review details
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (24)
src/app/blog/eloqdoc-vs-mongodb-architecture-and-design/cover.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngsrc/app/blog/eloqdoc-vs-mongodb-architecture-and-design/image1.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngsrc/app/blog/eloqdoc-vs-mongodb-architecture-and-design/image2.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngsrc/app/blog/eloqdoc-vs-mongodb-architecture-and-design/image3.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngsrc/app/blog/eloqdoc-vs-mongodb-feature-comparison/cover.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngsrc/app/blog/eloqdoc-vs-mongodb-feature-comparison/image1.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngsrc/app/blog/eloqdoc-vs-mongodb-feature-comparison/image10.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngsrc/app/blog/eloqdoc-vs-mongodb-feature-comparison/image11.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngsrc/app/blog/eloqdoc-vs-mongodb-feature-comparison/image12.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngsrc/app/blog/eloqdoc-vs-mongodb-feature-comparison/image13.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngsrc/app/blog/eloqdoc-vs-mongodb-feature-comparison/image14.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngsrc/app/blog/eloqdoc-vs-mongodb-feature-comparison/image15.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngsrc/app/blog/eloqdoc-vs-mongodb-feature-comparison/image16.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngsrc/app/blog/eloqdoc-vs-mongodb-feature-comparison/image17.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngsrc/app/blog/eloqdoc-vs-mongodb-feature-comparison/image18.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngsrc/app/blog/eloqdoc-vs-mongodb-feature-comparison/image19.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngsrc/app/blog/eloqdoc-vs-mongodb-feature-comparison/image2.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngsrc/app/blog/eloqdoc-vs-mongodb-feature-comparison/image3.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngsrc/app/blog/eloqdoc-vs-mongodb-feature-comparison/image4.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngsrc/app/blog/eloqdoc-vs-mongodb-feature-comparison/image5.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngsrc/app/blog/eloqdoc-vs-mongodb-feature-comparison/image6.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngsrc/app/blog/eloqdoc-vs-mongodb-feature-comparison/image7.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngsrc/app/blog/eloqdoc-vs-mongodb-feature-comparison/image8.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngsrc/app/blog/eloqdoc-vs-mongodb-feature-comparison/image9.pngis excluded by!**/*.png
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
src/app/blog/data.tssrc/app/blog/eloqdoc-vs-mongodb-architecture-and-design/page.mdxsrc/app/blog/eloqdoc-vs-mongodb-feature-comparison/page.mdx
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (2)
📚 Learning: 2024-11-21T12:59:54.908Z
Learnt from: tyaga001
Repo: tyaga001/devtoolsacademy PR: 31
File: posts/neon-vs-supabase.mdx:553-555
Timestamp: 2024-11-21T12:59:54.908Z
Learning: In `posts/neon-vs-supabase.mdx`, the external links at lines 553-555 are valid and accessible.
Applied to files:
src/app/blog/eloqdoc-vs-mongodb-feature-comparison/page.mdx
📚 Learning: 2024-12-04T09:02:22.583Z
Learnt from: tyaga001
Repo: tyaga001/devtoolsacademy PR: 45
File: src/components/Footer.tsx:15-24
Timestamp: 2024-12-04T09:02:22.583Z
Learning: When verifying the accessibility of blog post URLs in `src/components/Footer.tsx`, ensure that accessible URLs are not incorrectly flagged as inaccessible. Double-check the URLs before reporting accessibility issues.
Applied to files:
src/app/blog/eloqdoc-vs-mongodb-feature-comparison/page.mdxsrc/app/blog/data.ts
🧬 Code graph analysis (1)
src/app/blog/eloqdoc-vs-mongodb-feature-comparison/page.mdx (5)
mdx-components.tsx (1)
main(24-64)src/app/blog/page.tsx (2)
BlogPage(17-58)post(31-54)src/components/blog/BlogHeader.tsx (1)
content(20-95)src/components/AISummary.tsx (1)
summary(8-62)src/components/blog/ServerlessDiagram.tsx (1)
chartContent(5-21)
🪛 LanguageTool
src/app/blog/eloqdoc-vs-mongodb-feature-comparison/page.mdx
[style] ~59-~59: ‘a majority of’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ...ncern: "majority" ensure the data is on a majority of replicas (preventing rollback on primar...
(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_A_MAJORITY_OF)
[style] ~210-~210: ‘in conjunction with’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ...e utilises hybrid logical clocks (HLCs) in conjunction with its own timestamping mechanism. This a...
(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_IN_CONJUNCTION_WITH)
[style] ~231-~231: ‘a majority of’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ...ds a single point of failure as long as a majority of nodes remain active, for instance, in a...
(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_A_MAJORITY_OF)
[style] ~233-~233: ‘a majority of’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ...new primary if a region fails, provided a majority of nodes are preserved. EloqDoc’s archite...
(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_A_MAJORITY_OF)
[style] ~235-~235: ‘in conjunction with’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ...s shared durable storage (object store) in conjunction with caching. The object storage (e.g., S3) ...
(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_IN_CONJUNCTION_WITH)
src/app/blog/eloqdoc-vs-mongodb-architecture-and-design/page.mdx
[grammar] ~92-~92: Ensure spelling is correct
Context: ...grations can impact performance. 3. The mongos routers and config servers are addition...
(QB_NEW_EN_ORTHOGRAPHY_ERROR_IDS_1)
[grammar] ~124-~124: Use a hyphen to join words.
Context: ...t protocol. MongoDB’s single-primary per shard model means writes are natural...
(QB_NEW_EN_HYPHEN)
[grammar] ~124-~124: Use a hyphen to join words.
Context: ...otocol. MongoDB’s single-primary per shard model means writes are naturally o...
(QB_NEW_EN_HYPHEN)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
src/app/blog/eloqdoc-vs-mongodb-architecture-and-design/page.mdx (1)
20-145: Article content looks well-structured.The content is comprehensive and well-organized, covering architecture comparisons effectively. The static analysis grammar hints (e.g., "mongos", hyphenation) are either technical terms or stylistic preferences that don't require changes.
src/app/blog/data.ts (2)
22-48: New blog entries look complete.Both entries have appropriate metadata. Note that Part 2 appears before Part 1 in the array, which may affect display order on the blog listing page. If chronological or logical ordering is preferred, consider reversing these entries.
111-215: Formatting adjustments to existing entries look fine.The changes to existing blog entries appear to be cosmetic line-break adjustments with no substantive content modifications.
src/app/blog/eloqdoc-vs-mongodb-feature-comparison/page.mdx (1)
42-406: Article content is comprehensive and well-organized.The feature comparison is thorough, covering all major database aspects with appropriate diagrams. The security comparison table and deployment options are particularly well-structured. Static analysis style suggestions (wordiness) are stylistic preferences and don't require changes.
Pull Request
Summary
Brief description of changes and motivation.
Type of Change
Changes Made
Testing
npm run build)Database Changes (if applicable)
Content Changes (if applicable)
src/lib/toolData.jsonUI/UX Changes (if applicable)
Checklist
Screenshots/Demo
Related Issues
Additional Notes
Summary by CodeRabbit
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.