-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
Add ability to perform simulations with per-antenna beams #63
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from 27 commits
Commits
Show all changes
32 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
cdd3519
add new beam evaluation functions that use 2 beams
tyler-a-cox 53e233c
update multi-beam sims
tyler-a-cox 14840c1
update type of beam_idx
tyler-a-cox f284a24
add beaminterface import to cpu_simulate
tyler-a-cox 334aa87
properly place visibilities in correct location
tyler-a-cox c9be26d
make sure to copy beam so that results are not overwritten
tyler-a-cox 62ab5ea
pass beam_idx properly
tyler-a-cox 480f901
fix linux tests where _evaluate_vis_chunk is called directly
tyler-a-cox 8a8a7dd
fix: send baselines to remote fnc
a4ecc88
add missing kwargs to evaluate_vis_chunk
tyler-a-cox b1a54ce
add new test that checks fftivs against matvis for per-antenna beams
tyler-a-cox 0fbb68f
remove logic branch in BeamInterface
tyler-a-cox 7868e33
restore BeamInterface branch
tyler-a-cox 4b2955d
add source chunking to reduce total memory usage
tyler-a-cox 2deb785
add chunking to the simulation
tyler-a-cox 77f65fd
make some changes to reduce the memory
tyler-a-cox fbbad45
change source buffer arg
tyler-a-cox 13f14b4
fix adjustments to beams in tests
tyler-a-cox effe7f6
fix tests for ubuntu
tyler-a-cox 4a1eaa3
test wrapper errors with multiple beams
tyler-a-cox fe30b29
add better coverage to new beam methods
tyler-a-cox dbd772e
test failure modes in wrapper
tyler-a-cox 8ac9529
address coverage of cpu/beams.py
tyler-a-cox ec87979
add documentation
tyler-a-cox 769c994
Potential fix for pull request finding
tyler-a-cox a4914ff
Potential fix for pull request finding
tyler-a-cox 2449bbd
Fix nbeams calculation for non-contiguous beam_idx in prepare_beam_ev…
Copilot 6c3cf6d
Downgrade hot-loop logger.info calls to logger.debug in cpu_simulate.py
Copilot 552cc7f
use min_chunks instead of nchunks
tyler-a-cox c136b98
get correct beam indicies
tyler-a-cox f5844db
update tests to reflect changes to prepare_beam_eval function
tyler-a-cox f773460
update tests
tyler-a-cox File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmmm, this actually doesn't seem right to me. We should only include beam indices that actually exist, right? We don't need to use all pairs in the range from (0,maxidx)?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm now building the unique beam pairs array with pairs actually used in beam_idx array