[pull] stable-f44 from main - #2517
Closed
pull[bot] wants to merge 46 commits into
Closed
Conversation
…digest to 51c7b27 (#2475) Co-authored-by: ubot-7274[bot] <217212047+ubot-7274[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
…t to e7338ae (#2479) Co-authored-by: ubot-7274[bot] <217212047+ubot-7274[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
…digest to 9c79b8a (#2481) Co-authored-by: ubot-7274[bot] <217212047+ubot-7274[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
…digest to 97ae835 (#2486) Co-authored-by: ubot-7274[bot] <217212047+ubot-7274[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
…t to a93e788 (#2488) Co-authored-by: ubot-7274[bot] <217212047+ubot-7274[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
…t to 390a9dc (#2490) Co-authored-by: ubot-7274[bot] <217212047+ubot-7274[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: inffy <10782843+inffy@users.noreply.github.com>
This didn't break anything in CI, this is why this went unnoticed. fixup of cfd014f.
…t to c00fc6b (#2494) Co-authored-by: ubot-7274[bot] <217212047+ubot-7274[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
…digest to 59c7dc8 (#2500) Co-authored-by: ubot-7274[bot] <217212047+ubot-7274[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
taken from blue-build[1], this also happens to make updates smaller by 100MB. Might fix the following issues like [2] and [3]. I could not reproduce these issues myself and just using chunkah made it possible for me to overlay firefox with rpm-ostree. [1]: blue-build/cli@b6f36bd [2]: #2209 [3]: #2492 Co-authored-by: Daniel Hast <32797673+HastD@users.noreply.github.com>
follow up of: 16d6d18
If you specified --kernel-pin from cli it will now correctly verify and donwload the right version (instead of the newest one), if it's specified in the Justfile and CLI then CLI wins. The pin that is always set to an empty string would override it.
* feat(ci): rootless CI 26.04 runners use sudo-rs, which does not support this flag. It doesn't seem to have broken too much, Only thing I could see is the github token not being passed to the build. ``` sudo: preserving the entire environment is not supported, '-E' is ignored ``` So this is a good time to move over to a rootless CI I guess. * chore: unset target-dir for container-storage-action This defaults to the user container storage
* fix(just): disk-image recipe follow up of: cfd014f * run recipe as root in CI * fix: do load-rootful before disk-image
* feat(ci): package cache with OCI artifacts We are hitting a couple limitations in regards to actions/cache [1] with our new testing branch workflow, as we previously relied on scheduled builds from the main branch, which we no longer do with this model. Now we make new cache on merge_group on the first build on Sundays, I chose Sundays just because. Which means we run only a single build with no cache per week and use that same build to generate a new fresh cache. Else we would end up with 3 versions of vscode in our cache. There is no point uploading cache on *every* PR. For simplicity sake this has no handling/differentiation for our stable and main branch. When we bump the fedora version of our main/testing images then the cache for stable will just get stale. We are mixing root/rootless usage of oras/cosign, I made it use root or else we will get premission issues. [1]: actions/cache#1537 fixes: #2351 * define blessed day * chore: remove command -v prefixes not needed, running everything rootless now
…ee15 (#2509) Co-authored-by: ubot-7274[bot] <217212047+ubot-7274[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
…digest to 92c80b6 (#2510) Co-authored-by: ubot-7274[bot] <217212047+ubot-7274[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
…digest to b85b98e (#2512) Co-authored-by: ubot-7274[bot] <217212047+ubot-7274[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
…t to dbcd1f0 (#2515) Co-authored-by: ubot-7274[bot] <217212047+ubot-7274[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
…t to 3889933 (#2516) Co-authored-by: ubot-7274[bot] <217212047+ubot-7274[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
…digest to 050d2dd (#2518) Co-authored-by: ubot-7274[bot] <217212047+ubot-7274[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
…digest to 0e3dabc (#2521) Co-authored-by: ubot-7274[bot] <217212047+ubot-7274[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
…bc94 (#2525) Co-authored-by: ubot-7274[bot] <217212047+ubot-7274[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
we haven't used this for over a year, might as well remove it. This used to be needed in a time before we had renovate, before the bluefin split, we build way less images now in general and also latest and stable do not build from the main branch anymore.
should help a little bit with the openssf score
We should not rely on external actions if this functionality exists in official tools. We are only running this step when it's a stable image build so ommiting the make_latest thing is fine to my understanding. xref: #2528
We don't need any credentials after the initial clone. xref: #2528
…digest to 96488d0 (#2534) Co-authored-by: ubot-7274[bot] <217212047+ubot-7274[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
* chore: be explicit about secrets needed for image build Instead of inheriting *all* the secrets we are only selectively giving the called workflows access to the secrets we actually need. Currently we only have one secret we use for image signing but in the future we may want to have a separate testing key we use to sign testing builds only made in PRs and things like that. We may want to look into setting things up in a way so production keys are only ever used when we push to ublue-os/aurora. This also happens to make the experience a little bit nicer in new forks as the workflow will fail right after the start when the SIGNING_SECRET wasn't set, as opposed to when signing the image. xref: #2528 * chore: remove secrets from generate-release parts I don't know why this exists, we don't need our cosign key in this part of the workflow.
…digest to 2cb7976 (#2539) Co-authored-by: ubot-7274[bot] <217212047+ubot-7274[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
…digest to 5c83c21 (#2541) Co-authored-by: ubot-7274[bot] <217212047+ubot-7274[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: ubot-7274[bot] <217212047+ubot-7274[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
…digest to a02038e (#2547) Co-authored-by: ubot-7274[bot] <217212047+ubot-7274[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
…ac64 (#2546) Co-authored-by: ubot-7274[bot] <217212047+ubot-7274[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
* feat(chunkah): use oci-dir instead of tar-roundtrip /tmp is a tmpfs backed by RAM (8G) on github so this will also be faster than the current implementation because of that. See: https://github.com/coreos/chunkah#output-options xref: #2350 * always delete config and output dir so we don't fill up /tmp
…digest to b46719a (#2550) Co-authored-by: ubot-7274[bot] <217212047+ubot-7274[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
* feat(ci): setup runner with containers policy Currently for ublue-os/akmods and kinoite (not pinned by digest), we verify them and pull them right after. We can't trust the authenticity of those images, as the tag in the meantime could point to a different, potentially compromised digest. To avoid this, we set up our runner so that it will refuse to pull anything from Universal Blue or quay.io/fedora-ostree-desktops without first getting verified with the corresponding public key in our repo. With this, we can completely get rid of our verify-container recipe and benefit from the retry logic that is implemented in the podman pulls we already do beforehand. This would mean that local builds would no longer verify the pulled images, as the policy is very likely not configured, but I don't think that is super important. * fix: install cosign in non-production builds
…digest to 70699ca (#2555) Co-authored-by: ubot-7274[bot] <217212047+ubot-7274[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: ubot-7274[bot] <217212047+ubot-7274[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Member
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
See Commits and Changes for more details.
Created by
pull[bot] (v2.0.0-alpha.4)
Can you help keep this open source service alive? 💖 Please sponsor : )