226890 search filters improvements

[Jeeziorny]

AB#226890

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 95.00000% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 92.34%. Comparing base (567c491) to head (127ab46).
⚠️ Report is 39 commits behind head on develop.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
src/hope/apps/household/filters.py	92.00%	1 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️

❌ Your patch check has failed because the patch coverage (95.00%) is below the target coverage (100.00%). You can increase the patch coverage or adjust the target coverage.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #5912      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    92.28%   92.34%   +0.06%     
===========================================
  Files          494      494              
  Lines        34362    34388      +26     
  Branches      3603     3606       +3     
===========================================
+ Hits         31711    31756      +45     
+ Misses        1904     1883      -21     
- Partials       747      749       +2     

Flag	Coverage Δ
e2e	52.61% <37.50%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
unit	92.04% <95.00%> (+0.06%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[Jeeziorny]

Codecov check fail is false positive:

[pkujawa]

We should also pass program to db_search and use it in filters

[pkujawa]

FYI that's the place that is not covered by tests:

Actually this code is never reached - without value or with empty string, the method is not executed at all - that's why test_phone_filter_empty_value_ignored also does not cover this