Rework check_univention_replication nagios check script#20
Open
s3lph wants to merge 1 commit intounivention:5.0-0from
Open
Rework check_univention_replication nagios check script#20s3lph wants to merge 1 commit intounivention:5.0-0from
s3lph wants to merge 1 commit intounivention:5.0-0from
Conversation
Member
|
Thanks, I created a bugzilla entry: https://forge.univention.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53730 |
pmhahn
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 10, 2022
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Thank you for providing a pull request!
Please make sure you considered the following things
Link to the issue in Bugzilla
https://forge.univention.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53730
Description of the changes
We reworked the univention_replication_check nagios plugin to better fit our requirements in a large customer's environment. The primary motivation for this was that we're processing a lot of LDAP changes each night, and our on-call team was being woken up in the middle of the night, even though everything was allright, just the replication taking some time. We've been using this reworked check in production for 2 months now. As discussed with Dirk Ahrnke, we're now contributing this back to Univention:
The most significant change is the changed alerting behavior:
In addition, we introduced the following changes:
Note that this check is NOT A DROP-IN REPLACEMENT for the existing
check_univention_replication. It uses different command line arguments, the history file uses a different format in a different place, and probably some other breaking changes: