chore(ci): updated codeql #780
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request includes updates to several GitHub Actions workflow configurations. Key changes involve upgrading action versions for Changes
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/codeql.yml (1)
Line range hint
1-42: Documentation needed for CodeQL configuration changes.The PR description is empty, and the changes to CodeQL configuration should be documented to help maintainers understand:
- Why the security-and-quality queries were added
- The rationale for including test files in the analysis
- Expected impact on scan times and false positive rates
Consider adding this information to the PR description and checking the relevant items in the PR checklist.
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
36-36: the runner of "github/codeql-action/autobuild@v2" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/codeql.yml(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/codeql.yml (2)
34-34: Verify the impact of including test files in CodeQL analysis.The removal of the path exclusion for
*.test-d.ts(x?)files will now include TypeScript declaration test files in the analysis. While this could help catch additional type-related security issues, it might also increase scan time and potentially generate false positives.Run this script to assess the impact:
✅ Verification successful
Including TypeScript declaration tests in CodeQL analysis is safe ✅
The impact is minimal with only 5 test files (356 lines total) and may help catch additional type-related security issues.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check the number and size of previously excluded test files that will now be analyzed # Find all TypeScript declaration test files echo "TypeScript declaration test files that will now be included in analysis:" fd -e test-d.ts -e test-d.tsx --type f # Count total files and their combined size echo -e "\nImpact assessment:" fd -e test-d.ts -e test-d.tsx --type f -x wc -l {} \; | awk ' BEGIN { total_files=0; total_lines=0 } { total_files++; total_lines+=$1 } END { print "Total files:", total_files, "\nTotal lines:", total_lines }'Length of output: 699
33-33: Enhancement: Added comprehensive security and quality analysis.The addition of
security-and-qualityquery suite is a good improvement as it extends the default analysis with additional security and code quality checks.Let's verify if there are any specific configuration files that might need adjustments for the new query suite:
✅ Verification successful
The security-and-quality query suite is properly configured ✅
The configuration is complete and self-contained within the workflow file. No additional configuration files need to be adjusted for the new query suite to work effectively.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for CodeQL configuration files that might need updates # Look for CodeQL config files echo "CodeQL configuration files that might need review:" fd -g 'codeql*.yml' -g 'codeql*.yaml' -g '.codeqlconfig' # Check for language-specific query configurations echo -e "\nLanguage-specific CodeQL configurations:" fd -g 'codeql-config-*.yml' -g 'codeql-config-*.yaml'Length of output: 588
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for CodeQL configuration files and examine the workflow echo "=== CodeQL Configuration Files ===" fd . -t f -e yml -e yaml | grep -i "codeql" echo -e "\n=== Current CodeQL Workflow Content ===" cat .github/workflows/codeql.ymlLength of output: 1097
egordidenko
changed the title
egordidenko
changed the title
Description
Checklist
Summary by CodeRabbit