Skip to content

Conversation

@matia-lee
Copy link
Collaborator

Notion ticket link

Secondary Application Form

Implementation description

Steps to test

What should reviewers focus on?

Checklist

  • My PR name is descriptive and in imperative tense
  • My commit messages are descriptive and in imperative tense. My commits are atomic and trivial commits are squashed or fixup'd into non-trivial commits
  • I have run the appropriate linter(s)
  • I have requested a review from the PL, as well as other devs who have background knowledge on this PR or who will be building on top of this PR

@matia-lee matia-lee requested a review from YashK2005 October 9, 2025 23:31
@YashK2005
Copy link
Collaborator

@codex review

Copy link

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

@YashK2005 YashK2005 merged commit 06a7c69 into main Oct 10, 2025
5 checks passed
@YashK2005 YashK2005 deleted the secondary-application-form-backend branch October 10, 2025 00:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants