Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Another guest chapter, I guess.
There's a few things to look out for:
macros.tex
, which results in\Re
appears as\operatorname{Re}
instead ofℜ
. I think this is more convenient, but it leads to each Asymptote file takes like 0.02 seconds longer. I think this is negligible (remember to not add heavy packages tomacros.tex
then, otherwise total compilation time for all the Asymptote figures will blow up)macros.tex
topreamble.tex
. Otherwise Asymptote compilation time would be like 1 second longer per figure.Feel free to revert these (but if you do then change
\Re/Im
to\operatorname{Re/Im}
in the plot).If it's accepted I guess some
\mathscr{P}
can be changed to\PP
in the category theory chapter (Cohen forcing), and maybe some\operatorname
can be changed to\opname
elsewhere.I feel I didn't do modular form enough justice, I guess. https://www.quantamagazine.org/behold-modular-forms-the-fifth-fundamental-operation-of-math-20230921/ has a good introduction (except the relation to lattice which I can't really find in any source…), I can't really write that well.
there are some parts of commentary that I comment out… it is not your opinion though.
I guess I could add "for evanchen's actual writing, see 18-786 number theory II course notes". The 10 pages I wrote is worth about 3 pages of course notes, I guess.
TODO: