Skip to content

Conversation

@richard-ramos
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Pull requests titles must follow the Conventional Commits specification

@richard-ramos richard-ramos force-pushed the lsquic-2 branch 2 times, most recently from e4c7232 to 73c2908 Compare November 17, 2025 22:53
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 96.49123% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 87.21%. Comparing base (b3001a0) to head (d5b9686).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
libp2p/transports/quictransport.nim 97.36% 1 Missing ⚠️
tests/transports/test_quic.nim 85.71% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1886      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   87.25%   87.21%   -0.05%     
==========================================
  Files         280      280              
  Lines       43472    43452      -20     
  Branches       15       15              
==========================================
- Hits        37933    37895      -38     
- Misses       5539     5557      +18     
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
libp2p/protocols/pubsub/pubsub.nim 93.73% <100.00%> (+0.02%) ⬆️
libp2p/protocols/pubsub/pubsubpeer.nim 87.05% <100.00%> (-3.53%) ⬇️
libp2p/transports/tls/certificate_ffi.nim 83.88% <ø> (ø)
...ubsub/integration/testgossipsubmessagehandling.nim 88.66% <100.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️
tests/pubsub/utils.nim 94.58% <ø> (+0.49%) ⬆️
tests/transports/stream_tests.nim 94.83% <100.00%> (+0.05%) ⬆️
tests/transports/utils.nim 87.96% <100.00%> (ø)
libp2p/transports/quictransport.nim 93.16% <97.36%> (+1.44%) ⬆️
tests/transports/test_quic.nim 92.78% <85.71%> (-0.70%) ⬇️

... and 70 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: new

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants