Skip to content

RFC for geospatial indexing #87

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

adamk-janea
Copy link

No description provided.

Signed-off-by: Adam Kaczmarek <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Adam Kaczmarek <[email protected]>

## Open Questions

- **Coordinate Reference Systems**: Should multiple coordinate reference systems be supported, or should the system standardize on WGS 84?
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

IMO, starting with WGS 84 is a good approach while keeping in mind that additional reference systems could be supported in the future.

## Open Questions

- **Coordinate Reference Systems**: Should multiple coordinate reference systems be supported, or should the system standardize on WGS 84?
- **3D Geospatial Data**: Should three-dimensional data (latitude, longitude, altitude) be supported in the future?
Copy link
Collaborator

@yairgott yairgott May 21, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It would be good to keep this in mind as a potential future enhancement during implementation.


- **Coordinate Reference Systems**: Should multiple coordinate reference systems be supported, or should the system standardize on WGS 84?
- **3D Geospatial Data**: Should three-dimensional data (latitude, longitude, altitude) be supported in the future?
- **Advanced Spatial Queries**: Should additional spatial predicates (e.g., intersects, contains) be supported beyond radius and bounding box searches?
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Same as the previous comment.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants