Skip to content

Subrouter failure handler is ignored#2779

Merged
tsegismont merged 3 commits intovert-x3:masterfrom
takeseem:fix-2772
Feb 16, 2026
Merged

Subrouter failure handler is ignored#2779
tsegismont merged 3 commits intovert-x3:masterfrom
takeseem:fix-2772

Conversation

@takeseem
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@takeseem takeseem commented Aug 27, 2025

See #2772

Subrouter failure handler is ignored

@takeseem takeseem closed this Aug 27, 2025
@takeseem takeseem reopened this Aug 27, 2025
@takeseem
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

this pull but ok: ci test for 5.x in win11 cost < 7m

but another fail ci test for 5.x-stable

in win11 cost > 6h, the laste test is Starting test: SubRouterTest#testSetExceptionHandler

  • I test the case in windows 11 us vbox, many times, but cannot reproduce
  • I think may be it's my process the response's body method is incorrect, and has no timeout, so commit do junit assert in vert.x and add timeout

We can use existing testRequest methods

Signed-off-by: Thomas Segismont <tsegismont@gmail.com>
@tsegismont tsegismont changed the title fix #2772 Subrouter failure handler is ignored Subrouter failure handler is ignored Feb 16, 2026
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@tsegismont tsegismont left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you @takeseem

I made some changes so that we reuse existing methods in WebTestBase

@tsegismont tsegismont added this to the 5.1.0 milestone Feb 16, 2026
@tsegismont tsegismont merged commit ffe1332 into vert-x3:master Feb 16, 2026
7 checks passed
tsegismont added a commit to tsegismont/vertx-web that referenced this pull request Feb 16, 2026
* fix vert-x3#2772 Subrouter failure handler is ignored

* fix(test): do junit assert in vert.x and add timeout

* Revert changes in WebTestBase

We can use existing testRequest methods

Signed-off-by: Thomas Segismont <tsegismont@gmail.com>

---------

Signed-off-by: Thomas Segismont <tsegismont@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Thomas Segismont <tsegismont@gmail.com>
tsegismont added a commit to tsegismont/vertx-web that referenced this pull request Feb 16, 2026
* fix vert-x3#2772 Subrouter failure handler is ignored

* fix(test): do junit assert in vert.x and add timeout

* Revert changes in WebTestBase

We can use existing testRequest methods

Signed-off-by: Thomas Segismont <tsegismont@gmail.com>

---------

Signed-off-by: Thomas Segismont <tsegismont@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Thomas Segismont <tsegismont@gmail.com>
tsegismont added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 16, 2026
* fix #2772 Subrouter failure handler is ignored

* fix(test): do junit assert in vert.x and add timeout

* Revert changes in WebTestBase

We can use existing testRequest methods



---------

Signed-off-by: Thomas Segismont <tsegismont@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: takeseem <takeseem@users.noreply.github.com>
tsegismont added a commit to tsegismont/vertx-web that referenced this pull request Feb 16, 2026
* fix vert-x3#2772 Subrouter failure handler is ignored

* fix(test): do junit assert in vert.x and add timeout

* Revert changes in WebTestBase

We can use existing testRequest methods

Signed-off-by: Thomas Segismont <tsegismont@gmail.com>

---------

Signed-off-by: Thomas Segismont <tsegismont@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Thomas Segismont <tsegismont@gmail.com>
tsegismont added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 16, 2026
* fix #2772 Subrouter failure handler is ignored

* fix(test): do junit assert in vert.x and add timeout

* Revert changes in WebTestBase

We can use existing testRequest methods



---------

Signed-off-by: Thomas Segismont <tsegismont@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: takeseem <takeseem@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants