Skip to content

[release-21.0] bugfix: INSERT IGNORE not inserting rows (#18151) #18164

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: release-21.0
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

vitess-bot[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@vitess-bot vitess-bot bot commented Apr 11, 2025

Description

This is a backport of #18151

@vitess-bot vitess-bot bot requested a review from harshit-gangal as a code owner April 11, 2025 08:41
@vitess-bot vitess-bot bot added the Backport This is a backport label Apr 11, 2025
@vitess-bot vitess-bot bot requested a review from systay as a code owner April 11, 2025 08:41
Copy link
Contributor Author

vitess-bot bot commented Apr 11, 2025

Review Checklist

Hello reviewers! 👋 Please follow this checklist when reviewing this Pull Request.

General

  • Ensure that the Pull Request has a descriptive title.
  • Ensure there is a link to an issue (except for internal cleanup and flaky test fixes), new features should have an RFC that documents use cases and test cases.

Tests

  • Bug fixes should have at least one unit or end-to-end test, enhancement and new features should have a sufficient number of tests.

Documentation

  • Apply the release notes (needs details) label if users need to know about this change.
  • New features should be documented.
  • There should be some code comments as to why things are implemented the way they are.
  • There should be a comment at the top of each new or modified test to explain what the test does.

New flags

  • Is this flag really necessary?
  • Flag names must be clear and intuitive, use dashes (-), and have a clear help text.

If a workflow is added or modified:

  • Each item in Jobs should be named in order to mark it as required.
  • If the workflow needs to be marked as required, the maintainer team must be notified.

Backward compatibility

  • Protobuf changes should be wire-compatible.
  • Changes to _vt tables and RPCs need to be backward compatible.
  • RPC changes should be compatible with vitess-operator
  • If a flag is removed, then it should also be removed from vitess-operator and arewefastyet, if used there.
  • vtctl command output order should be stable and awk-able.

@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the v21.0.5 milestone Apr 11, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 11, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 67.55%. Comparing base (c20263b) to head (4082c09).

Additional details and impacted files
@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##           release-21.0   #18164      +/-   ##
================================================
+ Coverage         67.53%   67.55%   +0.01%     
================================================
  Files              1572     1572              
  Lines            252261   252270       +9     
================================================
+ Hits             170353   170409      +56     
+ Misses            81908    81861      -47     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant