Skip to content

Conversation

@fadara01
Copy link
Contributor

@fadara01 fadara01 commented Dec 15, 2025

Purpose

Add action to automatically label CPU related PRs
This helps us stay on top of changes in CPU Backend, and simulate code ownership for people working on CPU backend but are not maintainers.

Test Plan

N/A

Test Result

N/A


Essential Elements of an Effective PR Description Checklist
  • [Yes] The purpose of the PR, such as "Fix some issue (link existing issues this PR will resolve)".
  • The test plan, such as providing test command.
  • The test results, such as pasting the results comparison before and after, or e2e results
  • (Optional) The necessary documentation update, such as updating supported_models.md and examples for a new model.
  • (Optional) Release notes update. If your change is user facing, please update the release notes draft in the Google Doc.

@chatgpt-codex-connector
Copy link

Codex usage limits have been reached for code reviews. Please check with the admins of this repo to increase the limits by adding credits.

@mergify mergify bot added the ci/build label Dec 15, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request adds a Mergify rule to automatically label CPU-related PRs. The change is well-contained and serves a useful automation purpose. My review includes a suggestion to refine the file-matching pattern to improve its accuracy and avoid potential false positives.

@fadara01
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mgoin @simon-mo could you have a look?

@fadara01 fadara01 force-pushed the cpu-mergify-action branch 2 times, most recently from 50ac566 to 669e19c Compare December 15, 2025 16:55
@fadara01 fadara01 requested a review from tlrmchlsmth December 15, 2025 16:55
Copy link
Member

@bigPYJ1151 bigPYJ1151 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants