[ci] fix: fix precommit

[vermouth1992]

What does this PR do?

• As title

Checklist Before Starting

• Search for similar PRs. Paste at least one query link here: ...
• Format the PR title as [{modules}] {type}: {description} (This will be checked by the CI)
  • {modules} include fsdp, megatron, sglang, vllm, rollout, trainer, ci, training_utils, recipe, hardware, deployment, ray, worker, single_controller, misc, perf, model, algo, env, tool, ckpt, doc, data, cfg, reward
  • If this PR involves multiple modules, separate them with , like [megatron, fsdp, doc]
  • {type} is in feat, fix, refactor, chore, test
  • If this PR breaks any API (CLI arguments, config, function signature, etc.), add [BREAKING] to the beginning of the title.
  • Example: [BREAKING][fsdp, megatron] feat: dynamic batching

Test

For changes that can not be tested by CI (e.g., algorithm implementation, new model support), validate by experiment(s) and show results like training curve plots, evaluation results, etc.

API and Usage Example

Demonstrate how the API changes if any, and provide usage example(s) if possible.

# Add code snippet or script demonstrating how to use this

Design & Code Changes

Demonstrate the high-level design if this PR is complex, and list the specific changes.

Checklist Before Submitting

Important

Please check all the following items before requesting a review, otherwise the reviewer might deprioritize this PR for review.

• Read the Contribute Guide.
• Apply pre-commit checks: pre-commit install && pre-commit run --all-files --show-diff-on-failure --color=always
• Add / Update the documentation.
• Add unit or end-to-end test(s) to the CI workflow to cover all the code. If not feasible, explain why: ...
• Once your PR is ready for CI, send a message in the ci-request channel in the verl Slack workspace. (If not accessible, please try the Feishu group (飞书群).)

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request addresses pre-commit hook failures, primarily through code formatting adjustments. The changes align the code with the project's style guidelines. I've provided one suggestion to refactor a lengthy, repetitive list in a test configuration. Using list multiplication will make the code more concise, readable, and easier to maintain, especially if the number of layers changes in the future.

[gemini-code-assist]

This long list of repeating strings can be made much more concise and maintainable by using list multiplication. This approach makes the code easier to read and simplifies future modifications if the number of layers changes.

Suggested change

	"sliding_attention",
	"full_attention",
	"sliding_attention",
	"full_attention",
	"sliding_attention",
	"full_attention",
	"sliding_attention",
	"full_attention",
	"sliding_attention",
	"full_attention",
	"sliding_attention",
	"full_attention",
	"sliding_attention",
	"full_attention",
	"sliding_attention",
	"full_attention",
	"sliding_attention",
	"full_attention",
	"sliding_attention",
	"full_attention",
	"sliding_attention",
	"full_attention",
	"sliding_attention",
	"full_attention",
	*["sliding_attention", "full_attention"] * 12,