This repository was archived by the owner on Aug 21, 2024. It is now read-only.
Added spiral-switch-to-last-clojure-buffer#12
Open
dotemacs wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
Allow the users to switch back from from the REPL to the previous buffer belonging to the project.
Owner
|
@dotemacs looks good so far. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
As discussed in #11
Allow the users to switch back from from the REPL to the previous
buffer belonging to the project.
There is one issue, which I only caught when I tried to use the keybinding: intentionally the keybinding for
spiral-switch-to-last-clojure-bufferis the same as forspiral-switch-to-repl-buffer. The same as in CIDER.The only problem is that
spiral-switch-to-repl-bufferkey binding shadowsspiral-switch-to-last-clojure-buffer. Let me fix this. But until then please let me know what you think of this function. Thanks