fix: pr comments

[qjerome]

Fixes a bunch of comments in: #20

[oh2fih]

As the location changes, this would be a good PR to fix the documentation:

• How these are supposed to be used directly?
• Hot to use them via uv.

[qjerome]

We plan to do major modifications to cpe-guesser very likely leading to a new major version of the project, the uv-ify PR being only the first one of a series just to cleanup the project and start on a clean base. I don't want to invest to much time at fixing the current documentation and the README for the moment as the new implementation is still evolving. What I can do though is put a warning on top of the README asking people to use the latest stable release 1.2.0 instead of relying on the git version (which anyway is discouraged if you expect stable behaviour).

[adulau]

Thank you!

[oh2fih]

We plan to do major modifications to cpe-guesser very likely leading to a new major version of the project, the uv-ify PR being only the first one of a series just to cleanup the project and start on a clean base.

That clarifies a lot, thank you. Please feel free to keep me in the loop — I’d be happy to share thoughts on how to keep cpe-guesser broadly usable as a standalone library outside the scope of vulnerability-lookup, as it previously was within the cve-search project.

[adulau]

Following some different feedback, I roll-backed the changes and the UVify into develop branch and main is back to before the merge of the UVify.