-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 315
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update editors #1750
Update editors #1750
Conversation
Thanks Jake and Marijn for their great contributions to the ServiceWorker. Especially, they adviced me on standardizing the declarative routing (aka. SW static routing API), which brought me lots of learnings to the ServiceWorker and the standardization process. Recently, I and Monica became editors, and this change updates the editor lines.
@mkruisselbrink @jakearchibald Will you review this? |
I know some of former editors changed their affiliations, but I guess it is fine to leave them as-is instead of tracking their latest affiliations, right? |
@monica-ch FYI |
Yes, it is "at the time they were editors", no need to track changes |
Thanks. Let me leave the former editors as-is. |
SHA: 4e7e0fa Reason: push, by yoshisatoyanagisawa Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
SHA: 4e7e0fa Reason: push, by pull[bot] Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Thanks Jake and Marijn for their great contributions to the ServiceWorker. Especially, they advised me on standardizing the declarative routing (aka. SW static routing API), which brought me lots of learnings to the ServiceWorker and the standardization process. I cannot thank you enough for that.
Recently, I and Monica became editors, and this change updates the editor lines. We are happy to contribute to the specification and improve it.
Preview | Diff